July 19, 2008

The New Graeme Frosts

I assume many of you saw this, but I think everybody has to.

NPR profiled the plight of this family that has had to cut down on food. The headline on the NPR site is For Some Ohioans, Even Meat Is Out Of Reach. I'm sure the story was quite touching on the radio. I can almost hear the dulcet tones of the NPR announcer du jour, and the well produced transitions with acoustic music in the background.

Low-income families in Ohio say they are particularly hard-hit by the changes in the economy, according to a new poll conducted by NPR, The Kaiser Family Foundation and Harvard School of Public Health.

In the blogosphere, however, the story has a different vibe because it includes a picture of Angelica Hernandez and Gloria Nunez, the "starving" family:

Now I hate to be cruel. I have been heavy most of my life and could certainly use to drop 20 pounds right now. But only NPR could present these two as suffering from a lack of food. (Okay, I'll be cruel: the headline "Meat out of reach" is apropos because none of them can lift her arms! -- Sorry.)

Like the Frosts, the family that starred in the Democratic Radio address to support SCIHP, maybe these people have -- I don't know -- made some bad choices, or have perhaps done something slightly wrong that has kept their income from keeping up with inflation?

Nunez and most of her siblings and their spouses are unemployed and rely on government assistance and food stamps. Some have part-time jobs, but working is made more difficult with no car or public transportation.

Yet the high prices have hit them hard as the accompanying graphic shows:

They're not hit by high gas prices because they don't have a car. They've cut back on food (no more ice cream!) so they are saving money. Their energy costs at home are subsidized and unchanged. Why were they chosen by NPR to support this story premise? Because they were the only family in Ohio that claimed they were eating less because of food prices. And because there are no pictures on radio.

Chain of hat-tips: Instapundit, Gateway Pundit, Moonbattery.

UPDATE: Mean-spirited photoshopping from Snapped Shot: Mondo-Heh!

Politics Posted by John Kranz at July 19, 2008 11:23 AM

They had to cut down on ice cream! Cry me a river.

Yeah, subsidized housing. Healthcare is unchanged, because these two get it because the rest of us are forced to pay.

Somewhere there's a Third World village that's starving because of these two bitches. Not because these two bitches eat the same food, but because the costs of "public support" means the rest of us have less to spend, including on goods and services that Third Worlders could produce and thereby lift themselves out of poverty.

Posted by: Perry Eidelbus at July 19, 2008 1:49 PM

Not to mention how much money was wasted by "NPR, The Kaiser Family Foundation and Harvard School of Public Health" to discover whether low-income families are "particularly hard-hit" by the economic downturn.

Posted by: jk at July 19, 2008 2:35 PM

But without worthless studies and news reports that are easily debunked with the truth, what would these pseudo-economists and "fake but accurate" reporters do? If they didn't have these taxpayer-supported jobs, they'd...they'd weigh 350 pounds each, be on welfare, living in subsidized housing, complaining that they had to cut back on ice cream!

Posted by: Perry Eidelbus at July 20, 2008 10:46 PM

As the young folk say, LOL. I didn't recognize it as a jobs engine.

I was thinking of James Lileks, who counters such studies with "Dang, I thought the poor were going to come out really well this time."

Posted by: jk at July 21, 2008 10:49 AM | What do you think? [4]