"During my long journey through the world of evil, I had discovered three sources of power: the power of an individual's inner freedom, the power of a free society, and the power of the solidarity of the free world."-- Natan Sharansky, "The Case for Democracy"

Buy "The Case for Democracy"

View NASA picture


CONTACT:
jk [at] threesources [dot] com
AlexC [at] threesources [dot] com
JohnGalt [at] threesources [dot] com

AlexC Bio
jk Bio
Johngalt Bio
LatteSipper Bio
Cyrano Bio

February 8, 2010

Quote of the Day

Seeing The Who's 65-year-old Roger Daltrey and Pete Townsend perform "Teenage Wasteland" during the Super Bowl Half-Time Show brought to mind an image of the Soviet Red Army Chorus Alumni performing "The Internationale" at a Goldman Sachs Christmas party.

But maybe it's just me. -- Jim Glass, Scrivener.net


I rather liked it but will defer to brother JG in all things "Who..."

Posted by John Kranz at 6:07 PM | What do you think? [1 comments]
But Lisa M thinks:

As a WHO fan, I am disappointed that they did not abide by the "Johnny Carson Rule" aka "Go out on top."

All of my memories of the WHO's live performances will now be forever tainted by Roger Daltry's straining (and failing) to hit the right notes, Pete Townsend's halfhearted attempt to recapture a teeny tiny fraction of the energy of his youth and a drummer who could barely stay awake during the set.

Just....sad.

Posted by: Lisa M at February 8, 2010 10:06 PM

Happy Birthday, BSA!

Today marks the 100 anniversary of the Boy Scouts of America. In those 100 years, more than 110 million American boys have learned self-reliance, self-respect, leadership, teamwork, survival and a dedication to service - not to mention how to stay warm in below-zero temperatures and not burn the eggs when cooking over an open fire.

The Refugee is proud to be an Eagle Scout with Son of The Refugee close to that rank as well. The Boy Scouts remain the largest, most effective organization for teaching the core values that made this country what it is. Happy birthday, Scouting!


Green Appeal of the Green Police

If you already knew I'm an Audi afficianado in addition to being a green-basher you weren't surprised when I called the Green Police on the new ketchup pouch. The ad had me guffawing wildly, yet Grist Magazine's David Roberts argues that "the teabaggy interpretation just doesn't quite fit."

The ad is not just another pot shot at greens. It's an appeal to a new and growing demographic that isn't hard-core environmentalist -- and doesn't particularly like hard-core environmentalists -- but that basically wants to do the right thing.

Yeah, sure it is. Personally I think that movement peaked prior to 1998. Tea anyone?

But jk thinks:

Jim Geraghty will have a cup. He tweets:

Green Police: Biggest zeitgeist sign since Garry Shandling tried to "Kelo vs. New London" Tony Stark. http://tinyurl.com/yzu5gt6

Posted by: jk at February 8, 2010 4:15 PM

Crisis Me This.

John Stossel points out that, while Reuters grimly intones "Heart disease 'will kill 400,000 Americans in 2010'" they don't mention:
.
heart-disease.jpg

Or:

cancer1.jpg


Things that make us richer

I love this. Insty links to video of a new Ketchup package.

I bore everybody with this all the time. Small innovations in packaging never show up in GDP numbers but millions of small innovations provide us with a richer environment. The zip-lock® feature built into cheese and tortilla bags generally elicit a dull disquisition from me. But over time, this matters. Just like getting more memory in your laptop.

And yet, Paul Krugman, should there be a Republican in the White House, will tell us that we are poorer than we were in 1973.

But johngalt thinks:

Oh sure, you like it, but have the Green Police seen it yet?

Posted by: johngalt at February 8, 2010 2:26 PM
But johngalt thinks:

Oops. Wrong link. I meant to use this one.

Posted by: johngalt at February 9, 2010 3:00 AM

Penn Jilette on Obama On Vegas

A fun column:

I like to say I don't believe in hope, but I had the hope to move to Vegas to do a magic show. And I do hope that Vegas pulls through this bad economic time and people come and visit us and we do our stupid shows for all the stupid, hopeful people.

Obama, please remember, it was those stupid, very hopeful people who took the over on a stupid point spread on Obama with a stupid hope to help our country, which includes stupid Vegas.

The gamble Obama took with his run for president and the gamble that the American people took on him sure weren't taken at good odds. It wasn't putting everything we had on red in roulette, or "don't pass" in craps, or carefully counting cards in blackjack.

Obama's presidency is more than all of us putting our whole future on 00 in roulette. It was more like putting everything we had on one slot pull at the stupid Elvis impersonator slot machine in the stupid Elvis casino for the stupid hillbillies who are filled with hope.

UPDATE: Brother ka rubs it in that our President failed to pick the winner yesterday, Wayne Allen Root did. I will take a break from my Libertario Delenda Est campaign to link to a superb article: Lessons Obama Should Have Learned From Watching the Super Bowl.

Obama, Reid and Pelosi might snicker, but they obviously don’t understand the difference between Vegas and Washington D.C. You know what it is? In Vegas the drunks gamble with their own money. Maybe we need a politician in D.C. who understands the psychology of winning; who understands the motivation of risk versus reward; who has the guts to take gambles; and the courage to back his convictions with his own money, instead of the taxpayers’ money.

But Keith Arnold thinks:

That betting-on-the-slot-pull metaphor is going to leave a mark. He could do a whole television show on the present administration. Whaddaya think he's name the show?

I wish Obama's speeches sounded more like Teller's.

Posted by: Keith Arnold at February 8, 2010 1:49 PM
But Keith Arnold thinks:

By the way, I'd say it's a good thing that Vegas doesn't pay any more attention to Obama's economic predictions than they do to his football predictions:

http://tinyurl.com/ylobcgk

It's not just Virginia, New Jersey, and Massachusetts that the Obama Curse has struck. Indiana's now in that club as well.

Posted by: Keith Arnold at February 8, 2010 1:54 PM

Fat Cat Bankers Cause Depression!

Must read lead editorial in the WSJ today. If you have to subscribe to read it, pony up!

NYAG Andrew Cuomo has filed a fraud lawsuit against Bank of America joining as the WSJ Ed Page declares "the long queue of politicians blaming bankers as the chief culprits in creating the financial panic and recession"

But they click on over to the Housing and Urban Development web site. Take a moment and imagine explaining to the ghost of James Madison that we have a Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development, and that it is contained in the Executive Branch... I digress. Here's an item from the HUD accomplishments during AG Cuomo's tenure as HUD Chief under President Clinton.

HUD's Web visitors learn that in 1999 "Secretary Cuomo established new Affordable Housing Goals requiring Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac—two government sponsored enterprises involved in housing finance—to buy $2.4 trillion in mortgages in the next 10 years. This will mean new affordable housing for about 28.1 million low- and moderate-income families. The historic action raised the required percentage of mortgage loans for low- and moderate-income families that the companies must buy from the current 42 percent of their total purchases to a new high of 50 percent—a 19 percent increase—in the year 2001."

Damned, fat cat bankers!

The good part of this story is that I have been overwhelmed of late with nostalgia for the Clinton days. Spending was down, Buffy was on, NAFTA and GATT were kicking in -- as was China's MFN and WTO status. Yeah, he was boning the interns (Umm, that would depend on what the definition of "boning" is...) but IPOs were happening and life was good.

It is worth remembering that Al-Qaeda’s growth was unabated and that these seeds of future economic troubles were being sown. Hey, I still take him any day of the week over the present occupant, but the pleasant, silver-haired magistrate of bonhomie we see helping the Haitians is always pitched as being better than his successor. I'm not buying.

But Perry Eidelbus thinks:

To be specific, budget deficits were down during in the Clinton years. But as I've pointed out in the past, it wasn't because spending was down. Federal expenditures were as high as ever. It's just that tax revenues were increasing faster than Congress accelerated its own spending.

Posted by: Perry Eidelbus at February 8, 2010 12:01 PM

February 7, 2010

Super Bowl Has Been Canceled

A "truther" friend of mine (and BR's) shares this video -- approvingly -- on Facebook.

I think it proves that nannies come in all shapes, sizes, and politics. You could transcribe this and give the script to a young earnest bespeckled Boulder woman in a Che T-shirt and hemp necklace. And it would work pretty well.

So, whaddya say we all skip the Super Bowl and watch a documentary in the Federal Reserve? I'll bring dip!

UPDATE: Who Dat? I resign my membership in the reason and logic club. I am an AFC guy and was looking forward to seeing the Colts accept their reward for their talent, intelligence, and work ethic. But even I got caught in the magic. When the Saints were down 0-10, I started hoping that they'd avoid a drubbing. By the fourth quarter I had openly changed allegiance.

Jeez, you don't want to be in a foxhole with me...

Posted by John Kranz at 11:09 AM | What do you think? [0 comments]

February 5, 2010

You Like This

brown.gif

Oh, yes, I like this very much.


Quote of the Day

But Tancredo, a committed protectionist and anti-immigration crusader, would have been equally disastrous. It’s too bad that the Tea Party would open their first “official” convention with a politician who so ferociously opposes one of the key tenets of the capitalism. Fact is, committed socialists and Tancredo have plenty to agree on. -- David Harsanyi
My hope for the TEA Party convention does not match my hopes for the TEA Party movement.

UPDATE: Blog friend Terri and I do not see eye-to-eye on immigration, but she's no happier with Rep. Tancreado's speech:

If Tom Tancredo is the “face” of the Tea Party movement, then the tea party movement is dead. He’s pretty certain we should have Jim Crow laws for voting.
“People who could not even spell the word ‘vote’ or say it in English put a committed socialist ideologue in the White House,” he said.


Et tu, AP?

If he's lost the Associated Press, he's lost America!

AP - No, maybe he can't. President Barack Obama, who insisted he would succeed where other presidents had failed to fix the nation's health care system, now concedes the effort may die in Congress.


I was kidding

Sort of. I was kidding a bit when I suggested, a couple of days ago,

GM Owner Misspoke Telling Americans Not to Drive Toyotas

But the attention to the Prius brake issue unnerved me. Now Professor Reynolds nails it:
NOW IT’S brake issues for Ford hybrids. Funny how these problems keep hitting non-bailout companies.


There Ought To Be a Law...

The Internet segue machine comes through for me yet again.

I am watching TeeVee news in the morning -- against my better judgment. I am particularly tied to the weather these days and it seems almost worth it. The personalities are attractive and perky and I am luckily immune from most of the nonsense spewed.

Today, we are in full-out sturm and drang about "Sexting." WE WARNED YOU ABOUT THIS EPIDEMIC in no less than 49 Exposes. Well it has happened. In Falcon, Colorado, that hotbed of sin, a nude photo of a 12 year old girl has been sent to a dozen phones. I hate to make light of a particular instance; I feel for the child involved. But the media response has been disproportionate to the problem all along.

An interesting issue crept in. The father of a student was interviewed and expressed displeasure that his child had his phone confiscated and was questioned in what could be a felony case without anyone alerting his parents.

The FOX31 news crew would not understand legal nuance or questions of liberty if they were to bite them in the ass, but they did offer one piece of advice: "Students should disable the ability to receive picture messages."

Got it? Turn your phone off in case somebody sends you an illegal nekkid picture. Or stay home in the cave with no phone.

This has burned in my mind all day, but now the Doctor is in: Theodore Dalrymple suggests we fix global warming by banning lampshades. The first of his legal fixes came to him in what I knew as "Defensive Driving School:"

It was then that I had a blinding flash of illumination, a real eureka moment. The best, indeed only, way to prevent road traffic accidents is to prohibit people from leaving their houses in the first place! By a process of association of ideas, I remembered the slogan that was used during the war to cut down the demand for public transport: “Is your journey really necessary?”

Great piece.


Coffeehousin'

banner4.gif

La Vie En Rose: The Telecaster version.



February 4, 2010

Teleprompter is Your Friend

Dagny and I were amused when we heard the president pronounce the word "corpsman" at this morning's prayer breakfast as though he referred to a dead male. We laughed our arses off when he did it again! But his press secretary probably wishes he had his own teleprompter telling him what to say, even if he couldn't pronounce it either. While defending the White House over publicizing the bean-spilling panty bomber he tried to turn the tables on the criticizers.

"I think he owes an apology to the professionals in the law enforcement community and those that work in this building, not for Democrats and Republicans, but who work each and every day to keep the American people safe and would not ever, ever, ever knowingly release or unknowingly release classified information that could endanger an operation or an interrogation," Gibbs said.

"Never knowingly or unknowingly doing anything" is a good motto for the 111th Congress.


...Or Are You Just Glad to See Me?

How long until we import this European idea?

A British farmer who secretly built a castle and hid it behind haystacks to avoid trouble from local planning authorities was ordered by a court Wednesday to demolish it.

Farmer Robert Fidler built the mock Tudor castle in Surrey and moved into it with his family in 2002.

He says he had applied in 1996 to build a house on his farmland, but the authorities wouldn't grant him permission. So, when he and his wife were feeling "desperate," they found a loophole in the British law.


Can't Call them a Do-Nothing Congress!

The Democrats in the 51st Congress ridiculed President Benjamin Harrison and Republicans for annual federal spending that reached one billion dollars for the first time: the Billion Dollar Congress! Ahh, those were the days...

debt_limit.gif

217 Ayes (all 'D') - 212 Nays

Hat-tip: Roger Simon

But Keith Arnold thinks:

A billion? Pikers.

Posted by: Keith Arnold at February 4, 2010 9:10 PM
But johngalt thinks:

At the time they surely thought, what - a ba-billion dollars? Now we're barely impressed by a ta-ta-trillion dollars!

Posted by: johngalt at February 5, 2010 3:52 PM

Quote of the Day

We are all Austrians now. Over the past few weeks, in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Sacramento, New York City, and London, I've run into more and more institutional investors whose economic and financial views either knowingly or unknowingly reflect the influence of the Austrian School of Economics. I am in Zurich today and Geneva tomorrow. … How do you know if you are an Austrian? Here is a simple test. Answer yes or no to the following question: "I believe that this will all end very badly." -- Ed Yardeni (via James Pethokoukis)

So This is How 9/11 Happened!

Yesterday's Investor's Business Daily lead editorial is Bare Warning.

A chilling spectacle just took place before the Senate Intelligence Committee. Panel Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., asked, "What is the likelihood of another terrorist-attempted attack on the U.S. homeland in the next three to six months, high or low?"

And one by one, Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair, CIA Director Leon Panetta and FBI Director Robert Mueller all agreed an attack was "certain."

But log onto the Department of Homeland Security's Web site and all seems fairly calm. The first news item listed says, "Secretary Napolitano Announces More than $23 Million in Recovery Act Funding for Fire Station Construction Grants." And three of the other four news items on the main page tout the ways the department's $56.3 billion fiscal year 2011 budget request would be spent.

The go on to make a larger point about counter-terrorism strategy but the first thing that occurred to me was hey, at least Secretary Ridge suggested we stock up on duct tape!

But jk thinks:

I like to help up-and-coming bloggers. There's this guy in Tennessee has a respectable blog...

Seriously, watch Instavision today. Mark Thiessen on waterboarding, but most notably on the different approaches to terrorism from the Bush and Obama administrations.

Posted by: jk at February 4, 2010 4:04 PM
But Keith Arnold thinks:

"...Blair... Panetta and... Mueller all agreed an attack was "certain - and highly confident the intended target is San Francisco..."

I'd have said that just to see her reaction.

Posted by: Keith Arnold at February 4, 2010 4:14 PM

GOP Ideas

Bloomberg's Margaret Carlson is calling the GOP's bluff on their claims to have ideas other than "no" for economic and health care reform. Most of her examples are flippant or revisionist so the main reason to link is for her accusation. OK, I'll give you an example:

You can't just wish something into being, like the heading in their "No-Cost Jobs Plan" that reads, "Tear Down Self-Imposed Obstacles to Economic Growth." In other words: clear-cut pesky regulations about mine safety and meat packing. We might die, but we'll be more competitive.

Now, for my money I think President Obama himself actually had the best idea. I don't remember which policy retreat he said this at, probably the one with the GOP, but he more or less said, "In order to make federal outlays match revenues we would have to cut spending across the board by something like sixty percent."

Tell you what, Mr. president - I'll settle for fifty.

But jk thinks:

Spendthrift!

Posted by: jk at February 4, 2010 3:31 PM
But johngalt thinks:

Never let it be said I'm unwilling to compromise.

Posted by: johngalt at February 5, 2010 3:11 PM

The Ten Years of Failed Policies of the Bush Administration...

...or as Keith Hennessey puts it: Ten Years, Seriously?

Hennessey goes over President Obama's continuing campaign bromides one at a time. He acknowledges overspending (and personal bias) but picks apart the current Administration's attempt to exculpate itself. It is an excellent summation against the argument of "Bush broke it and Obama is trying to fix it."

This debate about the past can continue ad nauseam. At some point I hope it ends, but the President and his team bring it up at every opportunity. It is strange for a President to complain repeatedly about ten-year old policies and then not propose to change them. More importantly, this debate is not relevant to the problems we face today.

Yes, President Obama faced some enormous economic challenges early in his term. His predecessor did as well, even before the crisis of 2008: a bursting tech bubble leading to a recession in 2001, an economic seizure caused by 9/11, corporate governance scandals in 2002, a recession in 2002-2003, the economic uncertainty triggered by invading Iraq (this one was a policy choice), and eventually oil spiking above $100 per barrel.
[...]
More than the blame game, this is what concerns me about the President’s economic agenda. The President’s own projections show that his policies will not fix the future problems he identifies. Based entirely on numbers from the President’s just released budget, America will see the following results if all of his policies are implemented as proposed and work as projected:


Hat-tip: Prof. Mankiw

But Boulder Refugee thinks:

Ten years of policies over all 57 states.

Posted by: Boulder Refugee at February 4, 2010 2:43 PM
But johngalt thinks:

Excellent point, this. "Bush broke it" but despite Obama's claims, he ain't fixin' it.

One quibble: For most of the first year the O-ministration did bring it up at every opportunity. But toward the end of last year I honestly felt they were moving beyond the excuse, as if it had served its usefulness. But it's being resurrected again to explain away the really tough issues.

This reminds me of a line from the excellent movie 'Hunt for Red October' when the sonar man, seaman Jones, explains why the artificially inteligent sonar system often identifies unknown sounds as "geological" because its software was originally developed to explore for oil. He said, "When it gets confused it just runs home to mama!"

Posted by: johngalt at February 4, 2010 3:02 PM

Y're Breakin' My Balls, Murdoch!

Sorry, I've been watching way too much South Park lately...

Wow, the Wall Street Journal has really tightened up what it gives away. I subscribed for many years, and then dropped it, honestly, when they started giving away all my favorite parts for free.

Rupert has turned the thumbscrews down and I cannot live without the only source of information I actually believe. I got a nice "Come home, jk, we miss you" offer for a $79 One year subscription.

Uncle!


February 3, 2010

Blog Post Heading of the Day

Martians and Bill O'Reilly -- John Stossel

The rest of the post is good, too. Captures my thoughts on Citizens United v FEC perfectly.


Thank you Rahm!

Personally I agree with Jason Lewis that Sarah Palin becomes what she claims to abhor when she chooses to attack Rahm Emmanuel for calling the hard-core progressive Democrats in congress "f-ing retarded." He did so for suggesting they run campaign ads against fellow Dems who won't walk the plank for health care. Criticizing speech for being "offensive" is the stock in trade of the politically correct. But don't those people just need to get a life?

Instead I think all conservative-minded people should write a letter to Rahm thanking him for the best "he said it" moniker for our political enemies since the L.A. Times gave us Barack the Magic Negro.

But Keith Arnold thinks:

Giving credit where credit is due, Mr. Rahm did apologize for the the offense he gave:

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0210/Special_Olympics_Apology_not_accepted.html#

I'm trying to find out if Joe Biden was the one who accepted the apology on behalf of the offended minority.

Posted by: Keith Arnold at February 3, 2010 5:45 PM

GM Owner Misspoke Telling Americans not to drive Toyotas

AP:

WASHINGTON – Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood now says he misspoke when telling owners of recalled Toyotas to stop driving then.

Instead, LaHood says take them to dealerships to get them repaired.

LaHood told reporters it was "obviously a misstatement" when he told a House panel earlier Wednesday that he would advise owners not to drive recalled vehicles. The remark came during testimony to the Appropriations subcommittee on transportation.

Toyota's most recent recall in the United States affects 2.3 million vehicles with the potential for sticking gas pedals.


Perhaps they'd be just as tough with a problem in an Official, Government Owned Automotive Manufacturing facility.

But am I the only one who sees great opportunity for conflict of interest?

UPDATE: Nope, some clever Insty readers agree.

But jk thinks:

The Administration misspoke when they told all patriotic Americans to "crush their crappy little rice-eaters and get a good 'Merican car, like a Chevy or a Cadillac."

Sorry for the inconvenience...

Posted by: jk at February 3, 2010 2:35 PM

Taxes or Fees?

I love the smell of doublespeak in the morning.

Faced with severe budget shortfalls after a steep economic recession, state legislatures and governors are trying to raise money without raising taxes — at least not technically.

A fee hike, an increased penalty or fine, the elimination of a tax exemption — none of these technically counts as a tax increase, as far as many state lawmakers are concerned. Fiscal conservatives argue that a tax hikes are exactly what they are, but their arguments are likely to fall on deaf ears for legislators and governors wrestling with some of the worst budget deficits since the Great Depression.

"There's a certain American antipathy to raising taxes, so even if these are tax increases, there's an incentive to call them something else," said Joseph Henchman, director of state projects at the conservative Tax Foundation. "It's a trend we always see, but it's certainly going to be one that's stronger this year."


I feel for my friends from Colorado, but I suspect none of us are going to escape this.
On Monday, the Colorado House of Representatives approved eight bills eliminating tax exemptions on items ranging from online sales and farm equipment to restaurant napkins and plastic foam containers. The bills passed with no Republican support.

Were those tax increases? It depends on your political bent. To Democrats, the votes merely rid the books of tax breaks and loopholes for big business in order to avoid cuts to public schools and social services.

"It's time for corporate and other special interests to pay their fair share, and suspending a small fraction of the over $2 billion Colorado loses every year in corporate loopholes and giveaways is not too much to ask," Alan Franklin, president of ProgressNow Colorado, said in a statement after the vote.

To Republicans, the bills meant raising taxes on many of those who can least afford it: struggling farmers and ranchers, people running Internet-based businesses out of their homes, small businesses teetering on the brink of insolvency.

"At the worst possible time, we're making a choice to raise taxes on people who can't afford them anymore," state Rep. Scott Tipton, a Republican, said during the floor debate. "It's an overreach by government."

But Keith Arnold thinks:

Legislatures - Federal and State - need to be defunded and defanged.

I bristle every time I see that phrase "pay their fair share." Somebody please define that. When it's the money extorted to finance the reckless spending over which I have no say and no control, it's not "fair" - and I don't care how large or small that "share" is.

Posted by: Keith Arnold at February 3, 2010 11:48 AM
But jk thinks:

I'm sure we'll all be glad to hear that "Big Napkins" is finally going to pay its fair share around here!

Y'know, I'd love to get rid of exemptions and special tax rates. But I seem to notice my Colorado Democratic legislative friends always seek to normalize to the highest level.

Posted by: jk at February 3, 2010 11:59 AM
But johngalt thinks:

Thanks for bringing this to the blog brother ac. The story is reverberating across the nation, including Minneapolis where Jason Lewis was all over it in last night's first hour.

In addition to what's mentioned here Lewis points out that taxes will be imposed on software sales, internet sales (even to out-of-state buyers) and even on business to business sales.

(He also touches on why Gov. Ritter won't run for re-election. There's talk of an extra-marital affair with his U.S. Attorney nominee.)

Posted by: johngalt at February 3, 2010 2:58 PM
But Boulder Refugee thinks:

Let me make this easy on you, KA. The liberal definition of "fair share" is your share plus their share. Simple math.

Posted by: Boulder Refugee at February 3, 2010 4:11 PM
But Perry Eidelbus thinks:

I'm sure you all remember that California increased state income tax withholding by 10%, effectively so that people will have the privilege of giving Sacramento a 0% interest loan -- and possibly getting repaid with IOUs.

What isn't often mentioned is that Sacramento has slightly lowered its tax brackets, meaning the same income will pay higher taxes. The justification is "deflation," the sham borne of massaged statistics that give heavy weight to property prices and year-on-year fuel prices.

Keith, the liberal's concept of "fair share" is like a soon-to-be ex-wife's mentality: "What's mine is mine, what's ours is mine, what's yours is mine."

Posted by: Perry Eidelbus at February 3, 2010 10:22 PM
But johngalt thinks:

OK, I can't resist giving my version: "Fair" is what I say it is.

Also, a Heinlein quote: "Don't handicap your children by letting them believe that anything is ever fair."

Posted by: johngalt at February 4, 2010 12:31 PM
But jk thinks:

Heinlein begets PJ O'Rourke. His daughter complained that something wasn't fair. He responded that she was pretty, American, young, healthy, and relatively affluent, and suggested "you better hope things don't get fair too soon."

Posted by: jk at February 4, 2010 1:05 PM

February 2, 2010

Quote of the Day

Stated another way, even if TARP saved our financial system from driving off a cliff back in 2008, absent meaningful reform, we are still driving on the same winding mountain road, but this time in a faster car. -- TARP Inspector General's Quarterly Report.

Via Breitbart, via Insty

But johngalt thinks:

A faster car driven by a more reckless driver, and with a gas pedal made by Toyota. His recent speeches scold that "this is no way to drive a family's car" but the best he's offered is to "freeze at our current speed."

Posted by: johngalt at February 3, 2010 3:13 PM

I'd've Given it to Ahhnold

I'm a First Amendment purist, but after producing Snoop Dogg, one can almost sympathize...

But Keith Arnold thinks:

And if any of you are (1) truly interested or (2) finding it difficult to drift off to sleep tonight, here's the official "so let it be written, so let it be done":

http://www.ci.diamond-bar.ca.us/Modules/ShowDocument.aspx?documentid=7693

Yes, right here in anything-goes Kahleefornia (hey, congrats on winning the runner-up slot, Governator!),barely fifteen miles from my front door, they have banned live entertainment. But wait! This was done because of the number of complaints about noise and nuisance, so they... do nothing about the places which are the cause of said noise and nuisance, and give them a monopoly on it, but ban anyone else from getting in on the fun?

I should admit, based on transparency and Truth In Commenting laws, that I do despise karaoke, which I believe to be a combination of two Japanese words meaning "talentless" and "annoying."

Posted by: Keith Arnold at February 2, 2010 9:34 PM
But jk thinks:

Well said, ka. My flippancy catches me yet again.

Fancy me missing the segue, and pardon if this is not original.

But California! The very name conjures thoughts of freedom. Hardy folks from the 49ers to the hippies who refused to accept the norms of the status quo. Now, sadly, the Golden State is leading the way into nannyism: all those who rode to power by challenging authority have become authority -- with a vengeance.

Not to be harsh on your home, ka, trust me: Colorado is headed down the toilet right behind you.

Posted by: jk at February 3, 2010 11:16 AM
But Keith Arnold thinks:

No offense taken, jk. Harsh on my home? Ha! I'm a transplant - born in Massachusetts, raised in North Carolina (where it wasn't until I was eight years old that I learned "damn Yankees" was two words), and endlessly entertained by the folly of the locals. I've never been anywhere in my life where I've felt more needed.

Posted by: Keith Arnold at February 3, 2010 11:42 AM

Help is on the way!

According to the Senator-Elect's Facebook page:

Scott Brown will be officially sworn in on February 11th at 12:45pm.

UPDATE: You and 8,048 others like this.


Don't click this. Comments (2)