January 27, 2006
Groovy, Baby!
I am guilty of derisively dismissing a lot of boomer liberals as
being stuck in the 60's. It is particularly easy living in Boulder
County.
Arnold Kling suggests that many of today's leftists are stick
in the Conventional Wisdom of 1968, which he defines as:
- Anti-Communism was a greater menace than Communism.
- The planet could not possibly support the population
increases that would take place by the end of the twentieth
century.
- Conservatives stood in the way of progress for minorities.
- Government programs were the best way to lift people out of
poverty.
- What underdeveloped countries needed were large capital
investments, financed by foreign aid from the rich countries.
- Inflation was a cost-push phenomenon, requiring government
intervention in wage and price
setting.
His great article shows that
these were decent assumptions before Woodstock but that, since that
time, we have seen empirical evidence to contradict all of these.
Yet, these beliefs seem rather fixed in a lot of people I encounter.
Google Unwhacking
I thought that I was the only guy on
the Internet who did not want to do shock & awe on Google
headquarters. I may be, but VodkaPundit has some comments that
bolster my case. Stephen Green points out that they are ultimately hurting their
own competitiveness.
In a high-tech economy, the free flow of information
defines how competitive a people can be. Less freedom, lower
competitiveness. There's more to it than that, however. More
information means less opacity, and that means more corruption.
This, in turn again, means lower competitiveness.
China is trying to compete in the high-tech economy, while
crippling the tools that make such competition possible.
I don't mean to say that you shouldn't be mad at Google. I am,
and will be so long as they continue with such repugnant business
practices. And don't get me wrong – having Google, even a
restricted version, will in some small way prolong China's
dictatorship. And the Chinese people will suffer, by losing what
could have been a sharp weapon in their fight for freedom.
But it's not the end of the world,
either.
That's his point. Mine is still that
this company is justifying a 50 multiple to its shareholders. If you
pay $40,000 for 100 shared of GOOG, you are probably not too keen on
their missing an in on the fastest growing market in the world. Just
a thought.
Hat-tip:
Insty
Chinese New Year
I'm a frequent flier, and have been in some cramped conditions...
but this
has never crossed my mind.
Sales have soared ahead of the holiday as travelers prepare
for long trips home aboard trains so crowded that even the toilets
are jammed with people, newspapers said Tuesday. Supermarkets
report diaper sales have risen 50 percent since Jan. 14.
The problem arises from the need to sell twice as many tickets
as there are train seats. Those without seats must find some place
-- any place -- to put themselves, including in
toilets.
I'm not understanding why there's a need to
sell 2X the seats.
Here's a question: Will the Google News's Chinese version report
on this news? Depends, I guess.
Well, it is the year of the Dog...
I suggest that Google will not censor the fact that other, freer
countries do not expect their citizens to crowd in the toilet when
they have purchased a seat and that that alone will be a freedom
enhancer.
January 26, 2006
Alito Filibuster
Drudge and CNN both are flashing that former Presidential
candidate Senator John Kerry is going to initiate a filibuster.
A
link off of Google News confirms it.
Confirmed this info. Kerry's office says he is initiating a
filibuster
. . . of the SCOTUS nomination of Alito. His office
is rounding up support now.
I have confirmed this with John
Kerry's office staff.
With Senator Byrd going for Alito, I
believe the number of Senators for Alito stands at 54. Certainly
filibusterable.
What remains to be seen is how the Gang of 14 will act.
By filibustering Alito, Kerry is definately pandering for the
angry left vote.
This man was almost President. I hope this is not true, even
though it might be a great thing for the GOP.
Here we go again. Dear Senator Salazar:
I was disappointed to learn that you were voting against this
nominee.
I hope that you do not join a filibuster. I rarely suggest that
someone looks to Senator Byrd for guidance, but he is right about
the politicization of the confirmation process and right that
integrity and qualifications matter.
Judge Alito clearly has a majority of the US Senate, including
three Democrats as i write. Please honor your "gang of 14" pledge
and do not join a filibuster against this nominee.
Byron York at the Corner thinks it's a bit of harmless Kerry
weaseling
From a Senate source: Kerry's call for a filibuster comes after
his leadership, that is, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, decided
there won't be one. In other words, Kerry was making a brave,
Kos-friendly pronouncement in the total confidence that a filibuster
will never happen. And now, word is, he is off to Davos to continue
what some Republicans are calling a "filibluster."
http://corner.nationalreview.com/06_01_22_corner-archive.asp#088399
Not Just for SPAM anymore
Virginia Postrel and I know Bayesian filters for their
implementations in SPAM avoidance. She links to an article that discusses its promise in clinical
trials.
Not many ideas of 18th-century Presbyterian ministers
attract the interest of the pharmaceutical industry. But the works
of Rev. Thomas Bayes have improved greatly with age. The paper
that made his name was published in 1763 (two years after his
death), where he proposed a method to decide the likelihood of an
event while taking into account one's prior knowledge of what
might occur. This idea bounced around through the mathematical
literature for the next century or two, but it fell out of favor
in the 1930s with the advent of the statistical methods that have
been used ever since. For decades, no one heard very much about
Bayesian statistics at all. One reason for this was they're much
more computationally demanding, which was a real handicap until
fairly recently.
I'm a math guy but not a stats guy
ay all. I will try to find some rudimentary documentation on this as
it has really caught my eye. The current methods in trials are
broken, and cannot keep up with subtle interactions. Placebo trials
are flat out irresponsible in chronic or terminal illnesses, yet the
FDA still demand them.
Hat-tip: Don’t call her “Ginny…”
Byrd to Vote Yea
My brother-in-law just called with the news that WV Senator
Robert Byrd will vote to confirm Judge Samuel Alito to the Supreme
Court. He decried the politicization of the confirmation process and
said that it should be about integrity and qualifications.
I hate to spoil the moment, but he will be facing reelection this
year in a state that is getting redder by the minute. There may be
some politics, but there is more honor. His history in the august
body paid off here. Bravo Senator Byrd!
New Sheriff in Town
President Bush reminded Ford & GM that President Carter is
writing poetry, building houses and comforting tyrants -- and that
he will not be as quick to bail either firm out as our 39thpresident
did for Chrysler. "I have been very reluctant -- I'm mindful of the
past where at one point in time, a predecessor of mine was faced
with that same dilemma," he said. "I would hope I wouldn't be asked
to make that decision."
This from a WSJ (News Page) report of an Oval office interview, where the
president was cool to the idea of intervention.
Asked if the government should take any pre-emptive
action, he said: "I think it's very important for the market to
function." He suggested he felt optimistic about the companies'
prospects.
The auto industry's struggles could become a big political
issue in this year's midterm elections and beyond, especially in
Midwestern states such as Michigan and Ohio, where much of the
industry's manufacturing base is located. Ford and GM plan to cut
at least 60,000 jobs over the next few years, and the fallout
could ripple across the auto-supply industry as well, whether or
not the companies ever seek bankruptcy protection. While resisting
a bailout could cost Republicans support among some voters, it
also would serve to shore up their support among those who favor
free-market solutions.
This blog has been rough
on the GOP of late. I take this and the recent nominations of Chief
Justice Roberts and presumptive-Associate Justice Alito as signs
that we voted for the right guys (all but Silence anyway...).
Rather than shovel money at the failed business models of the two
firms, this president will use their difficulties as a springboard
to push market-based reforms of health care. Life is good.
I wonder if the major shareholders and the board of directors of
Chrysler considered the "graciousness" of the American taxpayer when
they sold the company to the Daimler-Benz?
Did we get a refund? did they pay the money back?
I say this as a happy Hemi Magnum owner. And I ask this as a
salivating car guy who really really really wants this to become a
production
car.
http://www.allpar.com/cars/dodge/challenger.html
As far as bailing out Ford and GM? No. What it would be doing is
throwing a life preserver to two companies who let their unions
dictate obscene terms (like you will produce X explorer this year)
to them for too long, as well as sucking for too long. (1972 - late
1990).
January 25, 2006
Google Capitulates
Ian at Banana Oil is closer to Chinese Google than I am, but he wonders whether anybody at the hypervalued
company has read Sun Tzu:
Abject surrender is not the way to foster cultural
change for the better.
And don't think for a moment that this will be regarded as a
move of strength or integrity. The Chinese will not respect you
for this. Read The Art of War. They won, and got you to give them
the victory on a silver platter. You are now the Communist
government's bitch, whether you know it or not.
Way to go, guys.
I join the blogosphere in
disappointment, but I cannot work up the high dudgeon. I wish Google
had given the ChiComs a lecture; I wish Microsoft had told the EU to
fuggedabout it instead of phony gestures such as hobbled versions
and limited source distribution.
But both Google and Microsoft have a fiduciary responsibility to
their shareholders that must supersede a company's desire to change
the world. I'd say the same to Ben & Jerry.
In the case of China, I have to think the more information the
merrier. The more people on even a bowdlerized Internet, the better
chance that the benefits of freedom -- if not Falun Gong movements
-- will be understood.
What works people up about Google is that their corporate motto
was "Don't be evil."
Selling out to the red Chinese is a pretty big step in that
direction, I'd say.
While I understand the fiduciary responsibility, can't a
corporation have ethics? (damn, i sound like a dirty hippie)
Like not selling out to frigging communists?
My opinion is certainly in the minority. While like most
West-coasties their bumper-sticker credos do match reality, I guess
if you consider filtering results on a search engine to be "evil,"
then I am wrong.
The ChiComs do a lot of real evil -- keeping one of its
unfortunate subjects away from the edifying prose of
ThreeeSources.com is a pity but not a piori evil.
My hope continues to be that as the Internet becomes more
prevalent, more Chinese citizens find ways around the filters and
that the volume of information becomes more than the officials can
monitor.
The fiduciary responsibility does not supersede everything but I
believe strongly that you are obligated to devote your efforts to
increasing shareholder value.
Firefly Season 2
|
This will warm JK's heart. Sci-fi nerds are lobbying hard
for Firefly Season 2
UPDATE: Sorry, I had to add the button --
jk |
The long-tail come to life! Excellent find, Alex.
Follow this link to vote on your preferences and tolerance for
additional eps...
...anybody else wonder what he meant by "Nerds?"
http://www.threesources.com/archives/001761.html
Scandal Rocks DC
Via email...
All of the evidence is not in, but it appears that Secretary
of State Rice may have slept with Senator Ted Kennedy. Will send
details when they become available; all we have now is this photo.
Long-tail casualty
Christopher Orr at TNR bemoans the loss of what he calls the B+
movie; you know, a decent film that does not aspire to blockbuster
status. I've always sensed this. I'm not a film buff in any sense of
the word, but I saw Burt Lancaster in "Come Back Little Sheba" and
thought how that movie could never ever be made today. It has a
literary feel, solid acting from Lancaster and Shirley Booth,
(spoiler!) and an unsettling and unhappy ending. Orr:
There was a time when Hollywood excelled at producing
such solid but unexceptional fare--Westerns are the classic
example--but no longer. These days, almost every movie needs to
have a special hook, a tease, something that will make it new and
different and (in theory) better. No one wants a base hit; it's
all about swinging for the bleachers.
The reason is clear enough. Back in the late 1940s, when
Randolph Scott was making three or four cowboy movies a year,
two-thirds of Americans went to the movies during any given week.
They didn't need a reason; it was just part of the routine, and as
long as the film was moderately diverting they generally felt they
got their money's worth. But TV watching has been gradually
replacing film attendance for decades, and today, with our
ever-expanding array of at-home alternatives (satellite, DVD,
pay-per-view, TiVo), just 10 percent of us go to the movies each
week. If we weren't actively lured with the promise of something
fresh and remarkable--a more radical twist (the lady detective is
also the serial killer!), wilder stunt (two helicopters collide in
the Lincoln Tunnel!), or bigger star (Russell Crowe as Stephen
Hawking!)--we might not go at all.
He answers
his own question at the end of the piece. These "films" have gone to
the small screen. He uses the example of the "Law & Order"
franchise. I've always thought most Buffy/Angel/Firefly episodes to
be small films more than TV shows. With the DVD distribution and
syndication, the business models have likely blurred.
Jay Leno Again
It is pretty much the apogee of lazy-ass blogging to paste in Jay
Leno routines two weeks in a row, but there are some good ones in
here. And the Tonight Show is way past my bedtime.
The government is still analyzing Osama bin Laden's
latest tape. On his most recent release he called Bush a liar and
said that he was just after oil. It's the usual stuff we have
heard before. Like at the Golden Globes. ... On the tape, bin
Laden has three demands: That we pull our troops out of Iraq, that
we pull the troops out of Afghanistan, and he wants to see actual
stars on "Dancing With the Stars." ... New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin
is being criticized for saying that God wants New Orleans to be a
chocolate city and that the hurricanes were because God was mad at
us. The good news, he was nominated for the Pat Robertson Lifetime
Achievement Award. ... Here's your government at work. This week,
the Consumer Product Safety Commission issued a recall for
thousands of Christmas lights that they say may pose a risk of
electric shock. They're recalling Christmas lights. Good timing.
What is it, January now? You think this is maybe where the ex-head
of FEMA wound up? ... The "National Inquirer" has reported that
Ted Kennedy has a 21-year-old secret love child. Is that really
the most accurate term, "love child"? Isn't "drunken fling child"
a bit more like it? ... Senator Kennedy wasn't available for
comment on the love child—he was overseeing a hearing on ethics.
... NBC has cancelled the "West Wing." That's when you know things
are bad—when even fictional Democrats aren't doing well. Can't
even get elected on TV anymore.
...and a friend who doesn't feel right beating me up in public
says "and it's the height of pedantry to say 'apogee' instead of
'height.'"
Guilty. Ouch. Heh.
Careful, you'll be elected "ThreeSources Editor" and have to
rewrite all our posts...
I'll let you slide (maybe it just the aerospace nerd in me that
likes "apogee"). As long as you don't go George Will on me. I often
vehemently disagree with his politics but respect his insight, if
only I didn't have to keep a dictionary by my side to read his
columns.
January 24, 2006
Screw Stare Decisis
Judge Alito's recommendation from the Judicial Committee was
given today 10-8, and his nomination now heads to the Senate for
likely confirmation.
Justice Alito will no doubt vote differently from Justice
O'Connor and overturn very soon, the worst Supreme Court decision of
my lifetime. I can hardly contain my enthusiasm.
Roe who? I am talking about McConnell v. FEC., where the
court determined that First Amendment rights apply only to Illinois
Nazis (man, I hate Illinois Nazis) and child pornographers. Those of
us who care about the direction of the country and its polity will
have to live under McCain-Feingold.
A case is perhaps headed to SCOTUS in time for the next election
:Wisconsin Right to Life v. FEC that could curb McConnell or
give the Roberts Court a chance to revisit it. The WSJ Ed Page sez:
A far better result would be for the Supreme Court to
use this as an opportunity to revisit McConnell altogether. There
is some hope that this could happen. Let's not forget that the
deciding vote to uphold McCain-Feingold came from Justice Sandra
Day O'Connor, who may now have heard her last case. Judge Sam
Alito is likely to replace her soon, and his track record suggests
he is more sympathetic to free-speech arguments.
Meanwhile, Congress might want to bear all this in mind as it
attempts to atone for its own recent ethical lapses by enacting
lobbying "reform." The practical effect of any such legislation
will be to further curtail political free speech, restricting the
rights of citizens to petition their government. If this case
shows anything, it's that there is no such thing as "good"
restrictions on free speech.
McConnell is, of
course, Kentucky Senator Mitch McConnell who braved scorn from the
elites, media and many of his fellow Senators in a brave attempt to
defend our rights.
Mrs. Sheehan Heads South
BOTW runs the Political Diary today as Mr. Taranto is off. For
what it's worth, I really enjoyed Political Diary and pleaded with
the good folks at Dow Jones to make it web based. Alas, you can only
get it by email and their systems are extremely unreliable. I
cancelled some time ago.
Today, Latin America reporter Mary Anastasia O'Grady highlights
the inconsistencies in Cindy Sheehan's "Peace Activism" and her
decision to attend a possibly violent, anti-globalization moonbat
fest in Caracas:
Indeed, the Sheehan tour to Caracas belongs in the
"you-can't-make-it-up" category: A bitterly outspoken American
citizen who has made a career of lambasting her president, she
travels abroad to celebrate with a dictator who has thrown his own
critics out of work and even put them in prison, stripped the
press of its freedom, destroyed property rights and militarized
the government. His political supporters are known to be armed and
dangerous and many Venezuelans in poor neighborhoods have reported
that they are afraid to dissent from the Chavez agenda.
Venezuela's arms build-up is frightening his neighbors and
threatening regional stability.
We're glad Ms. Sheehan has the freedom to travel abroad. Many
of Chavez's critics are denied that right, as are the critics of
Castro. But she shouldn't wonder why, when she opens her mouth in
the U.S., nobody takes her seriously.
January 23, 2006
Shape Up With Sam's Club
I'm NOT a Wal*Mart basher. I am a Sam's Club member and I defend
the colossus from my "folk Marxist"*
friends frequently.
But I have to laugh at this week's email circular. January is
National Fitness Month, so we are told to "Shape Up With Sam's
Club!"
Put down the bratwurst and potato salad buddy, it's time to get
fit -- and Sam's Club is here to help with these invigorating
selections:
- NFL Tailgate Toss beanbag football game
(Mistakenly, the advice to consult a physician before trying this
activity seems to have been omitted...)
- A Treadmill
- a weight machine
- a 61" HiDef TV (burn some calories draggin' that in from the
truck, boy!)
- 42" plasma HDTV
- 50" Dell(r) plasma HDTV
- digital camera, computer, &c. No more exercise
gear...
I am beat from all that typin' -- open me up a
Little Debbie snack cake to get my energy back...
Hell, they didn't even mention 12-ounce curls! Don't they sell
liquor? If not, try Costco instead with wholesale liquor outlets at
select warehouses.
There's nothing quite like a Little Debbie creme roll with a Bud
Light chaser. Physical fitness AND haute cuisine!
Yup, they sell booze as well. I think your training regimen would
be ideal for one preparing for a tough game of NFL Tailgate
Toss....
Folk Marxism
Arnold Kling provides some valuable phrases to better categorize
ideas and beliefs that we encounter frequently.
His piece on TCS suggested that we have internalized
the writings of John Locke (folk Lockeism) and Karl Marx (folk
Marxism).
Folk Marxism looks at political economy as a struggle
pitting the oppressors against the oppressed. Of course, for Marx,
the oppressors were the owners of capital and the oppressed were
the workers. But folk Marxism is not limited by this economic
classification scheme. All sorts of other issues are viewed
through the lens of oppressors and oppressed. Folk Marxists see
Israelis as oppressors and Palestinians as oppressed. They see
white males as oppressors and minorities and females as oppressed.
They see corporations as oppressors and individuals as oppressed.
They see America as on oppressor and other countries as oppressed.
I believe that folk Marxism helps to explain the pride and joy
that many people felt when Maryland passed its anti-Walmart law.
They think of Walmart as an oppressor, and they think of other
businesses and Walmart workers as the oppressed. The mainstream
media share this folk Marxism, as they reported the Maryland law
as a "victory for labor."
Like Michael Barone's
"Hard America-Soft America," this is a useful difference. While I
know few who publicly profess fealty to Marx's economic ideas (I do
have a niece proud to share his birthday), I know a lot of people
who have this internal predisposition. In fact, in present society,
you get folk Marxism inculcated by default. The only people I know
who do not exhibit it in large quantities make a conscious effort to
understand the benefits of the other side.
Wonderfalls
I bought the DVD to Wonderfalls last year after Tim Minear
of Angel & Firefly fame recommended them to
Professor Reynolds at Instapundit. The topic has resurfaced on Insty, and a quick search shows that
I have not discussed them.
My wife and I really enjoyed the show. When she got her video
iPod, it was the first thing she wanted ripped. Fox, in its infinite
wisdom, cancelled the show and there are 13 episodes on the DVD. I
wouldn't say that it's as good as Angel or Firefly, but it is still
better than anything else out there. I would not hesitate to
recommend it.
The long tail of TV is here. You don't have to watch what they
schedule for you. (By the way Silence, I have been watching
Veronica Mars on your recommendation. It's pretty good but it
has not captured my heart.)
Glad to hear you have been watching Veronica. I hope it will grow
on you, its one of my favs. I too enjoyed the quirky Wonderfalls
during its short network run. What was the name of the Canadian
actress who played the lead? I keep waiting for her to show up in
something new.
Caroline Dhavernas. She was very good. Firefly fans will also
enjoy a few-episode-cameo from Jewel Staite who played Kaylee.
Notes from the plantation...
The junior senator from New York is unsurprisingly chastised from
the WSJ Ed Page today. Shelby Steele lets her have it for pandering to a black audience
on MLK Day.
When political pandering goes awry, it calls you a
name. On an emotional level, many blacks will hear Hillary's
remark as follows: "I say Republicans run the House like a
plantation because I am speaking to Negroes--the wretched of the
earth, a slave people--who will surely know all about
plantations." Is this a tin ear or a Freudian slip, blacks will
wonder? Does she really see us as she projects us--as a people so
backward that our support can be won with a simple plantation
reference, and the implication that Republicans are racist? Quite
possibly so, since no apology has been forthcoming.
More surprising is a brief TNR "Notebook" piece:
When the Daily News asked on Tuesday night if she
regretted the comment, she said, "Absolutely not. As I have said
many times before, Congress is run in a top-down way." The last
time we checked, an overly hierarchic corporate management style
was not the biggest abomination of slave plantations, but perhaps
congressmen have been separated from their families, chained
together, forced to work for tobacco farmers, and publicly bought
and sold during those mysterious closed-door sessions. And Clinton
has been fond of the plantation metaphor for a while now: In a
November 2004 interview on CNN, she said, "[T]hey're running the
House of Representatives like a fiefdom, with Tom DeLay ... in
charge of the plantation." Plantation, fiefdom: We see a
rhetorical style developing here. Why doesn't she reach out to
Jews, who've sometimes been wary of her, by comparing GOP K
Street's intimidation tactics to pogroms in the Pale? And, come to
think of it, why haven't any intrepid Democratic candidates seized
the opportunity to describe Jack Abramoff's hustling of Indian
gaming tribes as a "Trail of Tears"? Oh--because most of them have
better taste, that's why.
I would have thought
Senator Clinton to be the only/most likely candidate to appeal to
the moderate, DLC-wing , New Republic.
This is a smackdown from a friendly corner -- not a good
sign.
Ouch, sounds like a very bad case of mixed metaphors to say the
least. Attacking Delay's heavy handed tactics has merit but I don't
think fiefdom and certainly plantation references are not valid. The
best Sen. Clinton can hope for is that people won't judge a book
before they have walked a mile in its shoes....
Silence, I am a little disturbed that this woman, whom we all
will admit is a Democrat leader, has played the race card in a most
callous and heavy handed way. That is more serious than any
structural rhetorical problems.
January 22, 2006
Review Corner
I'm in hormonal confusion today. My wife has purchased the BBC
adaptation of "Pride and Prejudice" and we are following the
romantic and personal trials of the five sisters. 'Tis a lovely
literary repast which does speak to the pedant in me. To compensate,
I will watch the football playoffs.
It has been a most meritorious drive, Mister Darcy.
But as it remains third and long after that willful and
obstreperous holding call, I daresay if Coach Shanahan does not
implement the draw, or send Mister Plummer onto the bootleg, I
shall be most aggrieved!
Go Broncos!
That's a disappointment. While the Broncos played poorly, that
was an almost perfect game from the Steelers side.
The Steelers are a classy outfit. I salute them and wish them
well in Super Bowl XL.
Jake threw three interceptions and fumbled twice. And the Broncos
STILL had a chance to pull it out in the end. (Well, before that
second fumble, that is.) I'm afraid that Jake just couldn't resist
the idea that he needed to do more than just his own, regular job to
beat the "woooo, scary" Steelers.
I've had a place in my heart for Pittsburgh since they started
drafting so many of my Buffaloes, but my money will be on Seattle in
XL.
Seattle, like more formerly beloved Eagles, is long overdue for a
choke. They looked good yesterday, but that just is more proof. Look
for it in two weeks.
I'm an AFC guy and I think that this Steeler team is for real.
When you force two great teams to play poorly in two successive
weeks, you're doing something right. I credit Mike Gower's superior
preparation more than I'd cite Peyton Manning or Jake Plummer for
failure.
January 21, 2006
Free Markets
|
Or, "When I was a boy..." I hate to play the Methuselah of
digital storage, but bad things happen when you stop being
filled with wonder.
I have discussed,
twice,
the lack of competition in education and the advances free
markets have wrought in other fields. I wanted to share my
latest purchase with you (we have a few veterans of the
storage industry with this blog). I just bought an LG 1GB, USB
disk drive. It weighs less than the nail clippers in the
photo. I bought it at Sam's Club for $60. |
|
The first programs I wrote were stored to paper tape on a
teletype. The teletype connected to a PDP-8 at Colorado School
of Mines over an acoustic modem. I remember very little
Fortran IV, but I remember the failures of paper tape. I found
a spec for paper tape on the Internet. The
ECMA spec from 1965 dictates that the holes shall be 2.540 mm
apart, therefore a "gig" of paper tape will be 1024 * 1024 *
1024 * .00254 = 2727304.2 m (1630.9 miles). The spec also
dictates that no roll of paper tape shall exceed 190mm in
diameter, and that the recommended core is 50-52mm. And "The
reel must be tightly wound in such a way as to ensure that a
coil which has an outer diameter of 190 mm and an inner
diameter of 52 mm shall contain at least 225 m of tape."
So each roll can contain 88682 bytes, and a gig of paper
tape on spec will constitute 12,121 rolls. Throwing caution to
the wind, and putting the entire gigabyte on a single roll
with a 52mm core, the roll will be 18.6 meters wide. This
progress marks less than thirty years, from my sophomore year
of high school in 1976 to today. What would 30 years of
competition and innovation in education have brought?
| |
Trouble with that stuff being so small is that when you lose it
in your couch, car, office, house, train, plane, etc..., you lose a
lot more stuff which you were backing up to it!
It's a double edged sword.