A memorable bumper sticker slogan from the era of which Paglia speaks was "Subvert the Dominant Paradigm."
Well, that paradigm has been subverted, and in its place the revolutionaries have installed an even more authoritarian paradigm in its place, albeit with wildly different standards of "acceptability." But wasn't it the authoritarianism they really objected to, more than the particular rules that were established? That's how I remember it being positioned, but that all seems so naïve and idealistic, today.
Me too. I'll check out the Tyler Cowen interview soon. Meanwhile, if you click through my link and read her short piece on free speech you'll find this other notable quote:
"We are plunged once again into an ethical chaos where intolerance masquerades as tolerance and where individual liberty is crushed by the tyranny of the group.
The premier principles of my new book, Free Women, Free Men, are free thought and free speech—open, mobile, and unconstrained by either liberal or conservative ideology."
My mental working title for the post was "Camile Paglia - Objectivist." An obvious overgeneralization, but the parallel to Rand's two "mystics" are inescapable: Conservative ideology being the Mystics of Spirit and liberal ideology being the Mystics of Muscle.
An Objectivist Theology Professor. I can sell that.
Heh™: Insty links to the same piece with the comment "I mean, if women were free, who would listen to feminists?"
Theology professor? Paglia? non! Art and literature.
Corrected I stand. I misremembered that false factoid from her dust-up with the Dawkins-Hitchens wing.