Comments: Non-linear events

Good point, well said. Coffee is on me...

Posted by Jk at November 8, 2012 10:17 PM

Martin Van Buren is elected in 1836. He has nationalized the Tammany Hall/New York political machine, the demography of those way out west states like Kentucky and Ohio favor the Democrats. After a landslide victory to succeed Jackson, clearly it's all over nobody will ever beat the Democrats.

Then, the Panic of 1837 and Van Buren loses in the 1840 rematch to William Henry Harrison.

Excellent point. I'm cheering up.

Posted by jk at November 9, 2012 9:58 AM

Right now the only question in my mind is whether it will be the Panic of 2013 or 2014.

Posted by Ellis Wyatt at November 9, 2012 3:14 PM

You're that confident about December, eh?

Posted by jk at November 9, 2012 3:34 PM

Non-linear event:- Petreuas esigning - Benghazigate? Yes, he says he had an affair, but could it open the gate to other revelations? Probably The Refugee just hoping against hope.

Posted by Boulder Refugee at November 9, 2012 3:56 PM

You mean when those mean old Republicans force a decorated war hero to resign because of their indefatigable pursuit of a ginned-up scandal to tarnish our great President?

That one?

Posted by jk at November 9, 2012 4:05 PM

I'm not content to wait for some random event to reassert ideas. In fact, unless the public's preference for security over liberty is reversed in advance there's an equally likely chance that some unforseen event will precipitate a totalitarian state as it will a free one.

I don't necessarily agree that our society will never return, but I absolutely agree that it has crossed a rubicon - and longer ago than this week. I'll post evidence of this soon.

Posted by johngalt at November 9, 2012 4:44 PM
Post a comment












Remember personal info?