November 5, 2007

Guild Strike

Meh.

Hollywood writers on both coasts are now pounding the pavement instead of their keyboards.

About 40 people hoisted signs and applauded, as picketing by striking TV and movie writers began Monday morning at the CBS lot in Studio City.

One writer said he's as ready as he can be for a strike -- but that with the cost of living in Los Angeles, "your bank account can never really be ready for this." Across town at the Paramount Pictures lot, about 50 strikers carried signs, as passing drivers honked their horns.


I wasn't going to even think about this, but I saw a video on the news tonight that showed a picket line.

What were they chanting?

"What do we want? _________. When do we want it? Now!"

How intolerably lame.

No wonder we get such feature films from Hollywood as Spiderman 3, Police Academy 27 and 10,000 reality shows.

The writers are completely unoriginal.

Bums.

Posted by AlexC at 11:15 PM | Comments (2)
But jk thinks:

What was the blank? Free Sushi? Sugar Free Latte Syrup? They're a pretty hard group to feel sorry for.

OTOH, I'm as big a fan of Schumpeter as you'll find 'round these parts, but in the transition to new media and new distribution, the gales are blowing hard. It's perfectly fair for creators to do what they need to ensure their property rights will be respected. I'm sympathetic to artists who want to get paid, I was one of 'dem once.

I'd also question whether the writers are the cause of poor quality -- they don't really get to choose what's green-lighted.

Workers of the world unite! (Your point holds, by the way, we have every right to expect better chants from soi disant professionals!)

Posted by: jk at November 6, 2007 10:59 AM
But Perry Eidelbus thinks:

Hey now, I loved Spiderman 3!

Posted by: Perry Eidelbus at November 6, 2007 12:19 PM

April 17, 2007

Fairness in Taxation

I watched this on Kudlow & Co. last night. Don Bauer Luskin applies the thumbscrews to Jared Bernstien and extracts a startling confesion:

Posted by jk at 6:12 PM | Comments (1)
But johngalt thinks:

Quick! Send this to Harry Reid! The time has finally arrived for a flat tax rate for ALL TAXI DRIVERS! Huzzah!

Then I just have to figure out how to get my PC and 21 inch tube installed in the front seat of a yellow Crown Victoria. I'll be the country's first "Mouse jockeyin' widget designin' native English speakin' taxi driver." Whatever it takes, though, to soften my tax bite. (I am 6 feet tall after all.)

Posted by: johngalt at April 20, 2007 3:08 PM

January 29, 2007

Jack Bauer's Dilemmas--and Ours

Taking a short break from serious reality to discuss serious fiction...

A short time back we had a short back and forth (I won't call it a debate) about the virtues of Fox Network's "24." JK asserted that the program is "about" the action scenes. I disagree, giving the writers credit for at least as much intellect and nuance as Buffy the Vampire Slayer, although without the same "hipness." WSJ's Brian Carney agrees:

You don't need to watch "24" as a kind of primer on moral philosophy, but you probably should.

(...)

All these episodes help the show to maintain a realistic moral tone. An enemy that rejects everything we hold dear about our civil society will inevitably force us to make compromises between competing principles and loyalties. The most interesting complications that ensue as a season of "24" unfolds are the moral ones. And the show's great virtue is that it never pretends that these dilemmas are simple or false.

Posted by JohnGalt at 2:55 PM | Comments (8)
But Terri thinks:

I can't believe that you mentioned "24" and "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" in the same breath!! Buffy is clearly the winner when it comes nuance if only because the acting on that show was supreme. Jack and his good vs evil while I have to dabble in evil to accomplish good may be nuanced but pulease! The actors, other than Keifer are cardboard cutouts of people. I had to quit watching after season 3.

Posted by: Terri at January 30, 2007 11:15 AM
But sugarchuck thinks:

First off, let me just say that I love 24 more than the next guy. Given that I live in blue to purple Minnesota, I love 24 more than most next guys, but I can't claim for a second that there is any subtle moral distinction or nuanced insight to be found. There is a venner of obnoxious Hollywood PC inserted to placate CAIR and the handfull of liberals that watch and that is it. 24 asks the question; if a bunch of raggedy ass terrorists threaten the good old USA can we hook their privates up to a Diehard, shoot 'em between the eyes, lop off their heads and use the severed noggins as bargaining chips with other raggedy ass terrorists. The answer, as my daughters would say, is "well duh...." Greatest show in the world, yup. Better than Buffy, not really.

Posted by: sugarchuck at January 30, 2007 12:07 PM
But jk thinks:

Terri, welcome to ThreeSources! I am a huge Buffy fan and, although we have Firefly/Serenity fans, I'm in a minority around here.

I started this, fully suspecting it would end in an all out flamewar. I had just started watching 24 this season and wondered if there were subtleties and layered meanings that I was missing (I didn't even get Sen. Kerry's "If you're stupid you go to Iraq" joke).

Twenty-four is fun for its high octane pacing and unapologetic patriotism, but I find I still watch Buffies, read the lit-crit about them, and catch new nuances after more than a dozen viewings. I cannot say -- and have heard nobody really claim -- that there is that depth in 24.

Posted by: jk at January 30, 2007 3:17 PM
But johngalt thinks:

Well, I clearly don't have the "Buffy appreciation" gene. I got Season One on DVD for Christmas a year ago and watched the whole thing. I had no urge to get Season Two.

JK says he is "not going to be coerced to aid a terrorist plot" but do you believe the frightened father fully realized the implications of "delivering a package" for the arabic kid across the street? Being forced to do so at gunpoint would certainly tip me off but c'mon, he's not supposed to know he's in a TV drama about terrorists blowing up America.

And objecting to this scenario as "unrealistic" makes me wonder what I, in turn, am supposed to think about vampires.

Is 24 as good as Firefly? Yes. But 24 is put together with a wide angle lens where Firefly, like Buffy, is a close up, individual story. They both make the viewer think and I, personally, can imagine myself in any of their situations.

Maybe it's the same kind of difference as that between science fiction and science fantasy that dagny and I continually debate.

The important idea though from the article I posted is this (seventh paragraph):

"But it is not merely a question of choosing between family and a greater good; or--in other contexts that crop up repeatedly on the show--between civil liberties and national security; or between torture and human rights. It is a failing of our politics that these kinds of questions, in the real world, are presented by both sides as either easy to answer or unnecessary to choose between--or both."

Posted by: johngalt at January 30, 2007 3:19 PM
But jk thinks:

I did not know of your efforts. It is very difficult to develop Buffy appreciation by watching Season One. A couple of episodes are good (The Pack and Nightmares) but there are no standout episodes, and the show does not really find its groove until later. Better to start in the middle and find your way back.

You do like Firefly. I compare Capt. Reynolds to Jack Bauer and find our beloved CTU agent comes up lacking. They both have beliefs (and I'd say both have a warning about discussions our government does not have). Mal is a deeply complex figure: tough as nails, stalwart in his beliefs, yet a mixture of real and fake bravado that is endearing.

Getting into later Buffy and Angel episodes, you see Joss Whedon's chops develop to where he could do Firefly. In Buffy/Angel, he had twelve seasons to craft a coherent, consistent universe.

On the scene. Wait a minute, pard'ner. In a week of terrorist acts, my friendly , neighborhood, MidEastern teenage neighbor holds my family at gunpoint, my son informs me that he has killed one of my other neighbors. I am forced to run an errand where I give A SUITCASE OF CASH to a man who says it's "not enough money." So I kill the guy with my bare hands (I guess my ATM card is in my green pair of pants) and I drive out to deliver it to another MidEastern-lookin'-fella. All during a state of heightened alert.

Am I delivering the latest Abba video? A pack of JuJu-Bees? (Infidel-Infidel-Bees). That is pretty hard for me to believe. The vampires, magic, and demons are allegorical in Buffy -- it is less a matter of believing as interpreting.

Posted by: jk at January 30, 2007 3:51 PM
But jk thinks:

And I want it noted that our beloved Randian blog brother is lobbying for "the greater good." What planet did I wake up on?

:)

Posted by: jk at January 30, 2007 3:59 PM

December 8, 2006

Online Browncoats

Wired News: Firefly Reborn as Online Universe

Now that's shiny.

Multiverse, maker of a free MMO-creation platform, plans to announce Friday morning that it's struck a deal with Fox Licensing to turn the show into an MMORPG in the fashion of Star Wars Galaxies or Eve Online.

The "Browncoats," as Firefly's most devoted fans are known, have been campaigning to bring the show back almost since the moment it was canceled in late 2002. Now they'll get their wish, albeit in a new form.


Hat-tip: Insty.

Not sure I'm the MMORPG type. (r-tard!) Without a large dose of Joss Whedon input, I can't see this being too interesting.

Posted by jk at 1:33 PM | Comments (2)
But TrekMedic251 thinks:

Sorry,..if it isn't the original show (or new eps) I'm not interested. Fix shot itself in the foot on this one.

BTW - check you instapundit link.

Posted by: TrekMedic251 at December 9, 2006 12:11 PM
But jk thinks:

No question you're right; this is miles down the excitement scale from new eps or another movie.

Ever the optimist, I'll point to the precedent of Douglas Adams, who personally became very involved in the crafting of the infocom game version of "Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy." That was a blast, to a level where reading the books after was a disappointment. (The book of his to read is "Dirk Gentry's Holistic Detective Agency."

Were Whedon to see it as a new palette and craft some of his genius into it, it might be something.

Posted by: jk at December 9, 2006 12:43 PM

March 23, 2006

South Park Kills Chef

This was actually a pretty damned funny episode.

    Isaac Hayes' Chef character got a true "South Park" send-off Wednesday night -- seemingly killed off but mourned as a jolly old guy whose brains were scrambled by the "Super Adventure Club."

    The thinly disguised satire continued the show's feud with Scientologists in its 10th season premiere on Comedy Central.

    The soul singer has voiced the Chef character in "South Park" since 1997, but left recently because of what he called the animated show's religious "intolerance and bigotry." Founders Matt Stone and Trey Parker said Hayes, a Scientologist, was mad that "South Park" mocked the religion in an episode last November.

    A rerun of that Scientology episode was mysteriously pulled off the air last week amid published reports that actor Tom Cruise, another Scientologist, had used his clout to bury it. A Cruise spokesman denied that.

    Hayes didn't participate in making Wednesday's episode; the character's lines appeared to be patched together through tapes of past dialogue.

    Chef repeatedly said he wanted to "make sweet love" to the "South Park" elementary school kids -- it seems the "Super Adventure Club" turns its members into child molesters.


Would a hearty heh be necessary here?

Posted by AlexC at 6:15 PM | Comments (2)
But TrekMedic251 thinks:

Now,..start boycotting MI:3! Maybe these Scientology cultists will start getting the message!

Posted by: TrekMedic251 at March 23, 2006 10:26 PM
But johngalt thinks:

Good idea, but I didn't need the South Park kerfuffle to boycott MI3. I stayed away from MI2 long before any of this stuff surfaced!

Posted by: johngalt at March 26, 2006 2:07 AM

March 15, 2006

"Oh, Snap!"

Maybe it's just a guy thing, or my distaste for Japanese cars, or my straight laced law-abiding revulsion to the hip-hop culture. Maybe I get too much enjoyment from smashing things, or pretty young eurobabes in short skirts, or middle aged techno geeks being portrayed as hip. But when I watched this commercial for Volkswagen's new factory "tuner" car last night my wife asked, "Is that funny?"

"If you have to ask...," I replied.

The other two ads in the series are here, and here.

Brilliant!

Posted by JohnGalt at 4:00 PM | Comments (2)
But jk thinks:

Yeah, I had seen the first one, and thought it a swing-and-a-miss. Watching the other two, I don't know if I am getting into the series or the others are better. I chuckled at If you vant me to de-pimp your ride, say vat.” “What?”

I love Japanese cars, but admit my eyes glaze over when commercials try to tie into hip-hop culture.

Posted by: jk at March 15, 2006 5:03 PM
But Silence Dogood thinks:

The "do you know what time it is" line was a sleeper hit to me - asked of a guy wearing a clock around his neck.

Posted by: Silence Dogood at March 17, 2006 8:27 AM