March 26, 2009Just another spring blizzardLike jk said, the Colorado wing is snowed in. When life hands you lemons, make lemonade! These pictures are a bit misleading. The snow around the house ranges from bare patches to 3 foot drifts, depending on where the wind left it. Out in the field it's about a foot deep all over. The 4-wheeler is just 2 wheel drive and I had trouble getting through in a few places. Thanks for the snow tube aunt Leah!
Posted by JohnGalt at 11:23 PM
| Comments (2)
But nanobrewer thinks:
But johngalt thinks:
I hope your Tejas assignment is as temporary as can be, NB. Being away from your spouse and worse yet, your kids, is one of the highest personal costs I know of. I recently thanked an Air Force Lieutenant for his service - at DIA en route from D.C. to Warren AFB in Cheyenne - and asked him if he has a family. He did not. "It's because people like you do what you do that people like me can devote themselves to their family," I told him. I also apologized to him for his current commander-in-chief, but that's another story. Posted by: johngalt at March 30, 2009 12:57 PMFebruary 8, 2009Evil Possessed Demon HorsiesWhen my hometown makes the Wall Street Journal, it is usually not good news. Not since Bill Owens was Governor anyway. But this one made me laugh. I do not travel for work anymore and I am long overdue to visit Sugarchuck and get some recording done, so I have not seen the public art in question: DENVER -- The mustang rears on splayed hind legs -- his nostrils flaring, his eyes glowing red, his taut body a slick, sweaty sheen of blue. Anatomically correct -- eye-poppingly so -- the 32-foot-tall fiberglass sculpture makes quite a statement at the gateway to Denver International Airport. I have not seen it but I like it already. Denver is a frontier, western city; I cannot see where it hurts to scare off a few wusses. And I like very much the idea of visiting football teams being greeted so welcomingly. Keep the horse!
Posted by John Kranz at 12:17 PM
| Comments (6)
But Perry Eidelbus thinks:
Oh come on. Even a Yankee like me can appreciate that symbol of strength. Posted by: Perry Eidelbus at February 8, 2009 1:18 PM
But Perry Eidelbus thinks:
And on the Western thing, somewhere in the old family photo albums are some pictures from when we visited Denver. There I was, 7 years old, sporting a cowboy hat for the first time in my life. Posted by: Perry Eidelbus at February 8, 2009 1:19 PM
But jk thinks:
Sounds good, pardner... Posted by: jk at February 8, 2009 3:46 PM
But Boulder Refugee thinks:
Spoken like two guys who have never seen it. This thing is UUUUGLY! It makes Mexican velvet art look classy by comparison. Target practice would be its only apt fate. Posted by: Boulder Refugee at February 9, 2009 12:07 PM
But johngalt thinks:
I'm with BR. I appreciate art when it inspires good thoughts and feelings. This thing doesn't. http://www.yelp.com/biz_photos/W3PYBnyspTrQGUPqkwr0ng?select=PECRNeXp-IN3GuugrCHM3Q This is what happens when we let governments commission works of art. Posted by: johngalt at February 9, 2009 3:59 PM
But Perry Eidelbus thinks:
That's a better picture than one I saw before. Whew. Is it too late to change my mind? That's not a horse. Posted by: Perry Eidelbus at February 11, 2009 11:44 PMOctober 20, 2008Colorado Bests Pennsylvania by Seven!Both our Governors received "D's" in the Cato Rankings, but Governor Bill Ritter received a 49 to lead the D's; Governor Rendell got a 42. Oooh! In your face!
Posted by John Kranz at 3:21 PM
| Comments (4)
But AlexC thinks:
You'll have to ask the Rockies how their golf games are doing... because my Phillies are in the World Series. Ahem. Posted by: AlexC at October 20, 2008 4:28 PM
But jk thinks:
Well, yeah, there's that... Posted by: jk at October 20, 2008 4:58 PM
But johngalt thinks:
I had to root for the Dodgers against the Phils because they're NL West, but as soon as they imploded the field was clear to root for that eastern team with the funny mascot. I was looking forward to seeing how the Phils did against the Manny-less Red Sox but their multi-million dollar pitching staff couldn't silence the Rays the way they did the Rox. The two main differences I saw were that Rays batters were far more patient then the Blake Street boys. I chalk that up to better management. (disclaimer: I'm a huge Clint Hurdle fan.) Anyway, it should be an exciting matchup between the young and talented Rays vs. the experienced and cagey Phils. Do you think Ryan Howard will FINALLY start hitting? Posted by: johngalt at October 21, 2008 12:39 AM
But jk thinks:
I have no allegiance to the division, though it's hard to imagine an instance where I'd cheer for an AL team (DH-lovin'-collectivists...) It happens that I have been a Phils fan my whole life, until our little backwoods got a team to replace them. Not sure why, I think the name amused me as a kid -- they were cemented to the second-to-last spot in the NL, but this Colorado kid held the flame. Damn, those Rays are scary, though. I hope some of the early polling is proven to be overly pessimistic. October 15, 2008More On 49Flyover country makes the WSJ Ed Page: When former Governor Bill Owens issued an executive order to achieve this objective for all state government workers, union collections fell by more than half. But that edict was rescinded by current Governor Bill Ritter, a Democrat and union ally. Thus the need for Amendment 49, which the state's unions are spending furiously to defeat. No puppets, though.
Posted by John Kranz at 3:19 PM
| Comments (0)
October 14, 2008Colorado Amendment #49Sorry, Keystone Staters, while you have a team in the NLCS (Go Phils!) we have to ponder a myriad of ballot referenda. I got an email link to this "High Brow" "Ivory Tower" explanation of 49: I came to Boulder in 1984. Since then I graduated from CU, owned a stage-lighting business here, got married here and started a family here, lost my daughter to cancer here, represented the community as an elected official on the RTD board, and wrote a column for the Daily Camera for four years here. I own a home here and my kids go to government schools. After 24 years I think it is fair to say I have every right to call myself a true Boulderite.
Posted by John Kranz at 11:01 AM
| Comments (1)
But Boulder Refugee thinks:
Although this Refugee may share Caldera's larger polical views, he has little sympathy for Caldera's predicament. Your Humble Refugee was born in Boulder in 1960. The city's move toward People's Republic status started with the war protests in the early '70s and with the Danish Plan (anti-growth named after its author Paul Danish) in 1972. The last Republican representative to be elected from that district was Don Brotzman in 1970 (he lost in 1972 to Tim Wirth). This Refugee has a hard time believing that Caldera didn't know what he was moving into in 1984. He certainly had to know after four years at CU. Once last point: you can't claim refugee status until you leave! Posted by: Boulder Refugee at October 14, 2008 5:14 PMSeptember 25, 2008Appalachia On The PlatteThe DC Examiner had an article on Senator Joe Biden's Coal-fired Gaffe Machine. While other gaffes were considered stupid, Chris Stirewalt considers the "no-coal-plants-in-the-USA" to be especially impolitic. But Biden getting caught on tape last week denouncing the use of coal to an eco-warrior on a rope line will be a blunder that will put a wrinkle in Biden’s blue collar. “No coal plants here in America,” Biden said of his ticket’s energy plan. Colorado coal culture? I have lived the past 19 years in communities that were founded on coal mining, but thought it all ended with the WPA. Minus ten points: the Colorado Mining Association claims Colorado is seventh in the USA in Coal Production. So I can be personally offended by one of Biden's gaffes -- excellent!
Posted by John Kranz at 5:32 PM
| Comments (0)
September 14, 2008Centennial State Spirit"Near Lyons" would be the foothills in Boulder County, pretty reliable Democratic territory, though I am not sure the participants live around there. I like the poll at the end of the clip.
Posted by John Kranz at 8:55 PM
| Comments (3)
But johngalt thinks:
You go grrlz! One has to wonder though if they have trouble getting a good sight picture through their burkas. Oh yes, that's right - they aren't required by religious law of the land to WEAR a burka. That's because they live in the United States of effin' America! And that woman caller to Boulder's progressive radio station thought Sarah Palin was "frickin' scary." Wait'll she gets a load of THESE ladies! Posted by: johngalt at September 15, 2008 2:51 PM
But jk thinks:
Progressive women are calling the Samtec Shrouded Header Hotline??? Posted by: jk at September 15, 2008 3:26 PM
But johngalt thinks:
Oops. My work is showing! Too many tabs open at once or something... Try this one. Posted by: johngalt at September 15, 2008 6:41 PMAugust 7, 2008Nostalgia for 2005Stop the presses! Federalism works. Lower taxes increase prosperity -- as does reduced regulation. In an article in American Magazine called The Path to Prosperity, (Do they have to pay Larry Kudlow to say that?) Amela Karabegovic and Alan W. Dowd summarize a report to which each contributed. Common sense tells us that low taxes, limited government, and flexible labor markets will help to spur economic growth. The Fraser Institute’s 2008 Economic Freedom of North America (EFNA) report offers a striking, yet unsurprising, picture of the benefits that flow from such policies. The report attempts to rank the 50 states and 10 provinces in freedom and economic activity as Fraser Institute’s Economic Freedom of the World index has done for countries. What struck me as a resident of a highly ranked state was fear that the most recent data came from 2005. Colorado elected a Democratic Senate and reelected a Democratic house in 2004. Democrat Bill Ritter was elected governor in 2006 to replace Republican Bill Owens. Owens was dedicated to freedom and low taxes. The new regime will not be so friendly to the taxpayer or employer. No doubt the state will fall in the growth rankings as well.
Posted by John Kranz at 1:16 PM
| Comments (1)
But johngalt thinks:
"Owens was dedicated to freedom and low taxes.*" * Until, that is, he decided to support the $10B tax increase known as "Referendum C" in the same election that CO voters chose that Democrat governor to replace him. Colorado Democrats recognize the state's economy as a fairly unmolested 'golden goose.' Now they're in a position to gore that goose to their hearts' content. Posted by: johngalt at August 10, 2008 4:41 PMJuly 17, 2008Why are we in Iraq?"Joe from Denver wants to know, 'Why are we in Iraq and how will we know when we've won the war?'" Listen to Bob Schaffer, Colorado's Republican candidate for the US Senate, explain it. In politics this is what's known as a direct hit.
Posted by JohnGalt at 3:29 PM
| Comments (2)
But jk thinks:
But Bush Lied!!! There were no WMDs!! My poor Congressman was duped -- it's Bush's fault! Posted by: jk at July 18, 2008 10:50 AM
But Boulder Refugee thinks:
It don't get any better'n that! Posted by: Boulder Refugee at July 18, 2008 12:10 PMFebruary 6, 2008If Guiness Says It...This establishment is about halfway between JohnGalt's house and mine. Denver Post:
Posted by John Kranz at 11:41 AM
January 14, 2008RomneyCare: Coming to ColoradoPart of me worries about the Centennial State; the rest of me has given up. We have a Democrat Governor, both houses under Democratic rule, every tax increase passes easily, a massive light rail project passed in 2004. Next is RomneyCare. Just because it is an abject failure in Massachusetts, why not have it here? (Justice Brandeis, call your office!) Boulderite Brian T. Schwartz, Ph.D. calls it "Collective Punishment" in TCSDaily. When government policies increase insurance costs, the first to drop coverage are the young and healthy. Those remaining in the insurance pool are at higher risk to incur medical expenses, so premiums rise again, which again drives out the healthiest remaining customers. It takes some nerve to support policies that make insurance prohibitively expensive and then make it a crime not to purchase insurance. UPDATE: (Make lemonade Dept.) I found a good website: Colorado Freedom Report. Welcome to the blogroll.
Posted by John Kranz at 5:55 PM
| Comments (1)
But TrekMedic251 thinks:
Rendell's trying to pass the same thing in PA! Surprised Alex didn't jump on this. Posted by: TrekMedic251 at January 14, 2008 10:04 PMDecember 20, 2007Sen. Salazar RespondsTo my letter: Dear John:
Posted by John Kranz at 5:33 PM
| Comments (2)
But Perry Eidelbus thinks:
So as someone who grew up sucking at government's teat, he continues to support the notion of stealing money from Peter to make a livelihood for Paul. What a bastard. Posted by: Perry Eidelbus at December 21, 2007 12:23 PM
But jk thinks:
Yup. As Democrat bastards go, I think he might be one of the better, but it was a heartbreaking loss in 2004. Pete Coors would have made an outstanding Senator and, I suspect, have been a favorite around ThreeSources. Sigh. Posted by: jk at December 21, 2007 12:32 PMNovember 30, 2007Colorado Politics Prediction MarketA good friend has started a prediction market for all Colorado House races and Allard's Senate seat.
Posted by John Kranz at 4:16 PM
| Comments (2)
But jk thinks:
Overconfident? I bought Bob Schaffer big as my first trade; the +16% you see is mine. This is a trade, I fear Udall will win, but this should tighten up. I'm guessing I could get out at Schaffer 40 before the election. Posted by: jk at November 30, 2007 4:27 PM
But AlexC thinks:
I'll have to check that out for Pa... thanks. Posted by: AlexC at November 30, 2007 5:05 PMNovember 21, 2007Only In BoulderBoulderites love the phrase "Only In Boulder." It is used as a compliment. I saw a guy at the dog park in a tux and high tops last night -- OIB... The city has much to recommend it. I am not impervious to its charms, but I am deeply suspicious of its politics. David Harsanyl, a Denver Post reporter who has written a book about the Nanny State, has a frightening story about its capital: The story is so absurd, so unfair, so ludicrous, I had a difficult time believing that it could actually happen - even in Boulder. You have to read the whole thing. The short version is that a couple bought a piece of property in the 80s and did not develop it. When they tried to build a house in 2006, they found that a Boulder bigwig now owned a significant piece of it: Former Boulder District Judge, Boulder Mayor, RTD board member - among other elected positions - Richard McLean and his wife, attorney Edith Stevens, used an arcane common law called "adverse possession" to claim the land for their own. I certainly think Kelo v. New London was poorly decided, but it pales against this. Because this guy frequently trespassed, it is now his. And he will get away with it, Only in Freaking Boulder. Hat-tip: Insty (oddly, the place I learn about something that happened ten miles from my home...)
Posted by John Kranz at 11:08 AM
| Comments (3)
But mdmhvonpa thinks:
Not an uncommon law unfortunately. I've heard of this before in a lot of places. This is why when children trespass on your land as a 'short cut', all them old farts yelling at them know the real deal. If it gets used enough, it can be seized! Posted by: mdmhvonpa at November 21, 2007 6:54 PM
But jk thinks:
That's a drag for property rights. However, I will really enjoy owning the Starbucks drive-thru... Posted by: jk at November 21, 2007 7:37 PM
But jk thinks:
Amazon just let me know that Harsanyl's book has shipped. I had to buy it after reading the whole title: "Nanny State: How Food Fascists, Teetotaling Do-Gooders, Priggish Moralists, and other Boneheaded Bureaucrats are Turning America into a Nation of Children" Posted by: jk at November 22, 2007 12:22 PMNovember 10, 2007Purple, Heading Toward IndigoI started to hijack jg's excellent post on Global Warming and its foothold in the Colorado schools. I was going to digress enough that a new post is likely in order. Out of staters may not have seen, but in our odd-year election, I think every single tax increase on the ballot all across the state passed. There's a hunger for government in the Centennial State. We gave both legislative houses to the Democrats in 2004 and elected a Democratic Governor in 2006. People who think Americans yearn for liberty have every right to be disheartened that it is slipping away in a part of the country that cherishes independence and has had great prosperity from low taxes and limited regulation. If you can’t sell freedom in Colorado – and you apparently can’t – you need a new PR firm. Ryan Sagar's Brilliant Elephant in the Room talked about little-l libertarians in the mountain west who tend to vote Republican. I certainly saw myself in that picture, but I do not see a model for electoral success. Nevada sends Harry Reid to the Senate, Arizona -- Goldwaterland, mind you -- has a Democratic Governor, New Mexico and Colorado are in play every election. Utah could not overcome Union resistance to school vouchers. I think Giuliani might appeal to enough Republicans and moderates to carry Colorado, but I bet my current Congressman, Jeff Udall (yeah, one of those Udalls), will be our next Senator. As Sager says, John Kerry could have just as easily flipped enough votes in the Mountain West to win the election as in Ohio. The machine is broken out here. I don't know how to fix it.
Posted by John Kranz at 12:58 PM
April 24, 2007Noah, Prepare the ArkIn the semi-arid high desert of Colorado, any accumulation of rainfall exceeding one inch in a single day is big news. Atlantis Farm is in danger of floating away today. (See "Precipitation" in the Daily Statistics table.)
Posted by JohnGalt at 3:36 PM
| Comments (2)
But jk thinks:
Better load the cats and horses up -- it is still pouring over here. I am still reeling from jg's using a biblical reference. Is it, perhaps, raining fire? Posted by: jk at April 24, 2007 5:49 PM
But johngalt thinks:
When in Rome... Posted by: johngalt at April 25, 2007 1:43 AMFebruary 1, 2007Propeller-Head? MoiDagny is rolling her eyes by now, but I just have to post a banner showing the local weather conditions at... Atlantis Farm. On Monday I received my new weather station, assembled it and installed the batteries. Tuesday evening I mounted the sensor suite on a post in the yard. Tonight I installed the software and connected the console to the PC. Then I configured it to upload data to Weather Underground every 5 minutes, from whence this banner originates. Dagny thinks it's cool, but not as cool as I do.
Posted by JohnGalt at 2:29 AM
| Comments (7)
But AlexC thinks:
My vote is for "very sweet." Posted by: AlexC at February 1, 2007 1:46 PM
But jk thinks:
I live about 12 miles from jg, at about the same elevation. You can bet my weather is pretty close. I think we need to get the Pennsylvania weather now. AC? I'll find them both a home in the navigation bar. What concerns me is that the Longitude and Longitude coordinates could be used by the forces of darkness and the enemies of modernity to program into their GPS bombs.
But AlexC thinks:
Despite what I might think, I'm not sure Mrs AlexC would think $1,000 for a weatherstation would be that "sweet." But my zip code is 19426 if you're interested. Man... I'd like to see my poolside temp on the web though.... Posted by: AlexC at February 2, 2007 12:24 PM
But jk thinks:
I forgot. I was reminded on TV this morning that Pennsylvanians predict the weather with rodents. You wouldn't need a $1000 weather station. Happy early spring! Happy Groundhog Day!
But johngalt thinks:
Yes, I was hoping you'd make it a permanent addition. There are other stations available for way less than $1K. Some are from Davis (wireless version for $100 more) and some from elsewhere. I got a 40% discount on Davis through my employer that I could proxy for any interested ThreeSourcer. There are other personal weather stations that may be even closer to you JK (and anyone else for that matter.) They can be viewed graphically here. (Just enter your zip code) Posted by: johngalt at February 2, 2007 9:13 PM
But johngalt thinks:
Here are the personal weather stations around Collegeville, PA (zip code 19426) presented graphically on a Google Map. Which one is closest to you, AlexC? Maybe we can create a banner for that station. Posted by: johngalt at February 3, 2007 7:05 PMSeptember 30, 2006Red November, CO-4The race is heating up in Colorado 4 and state wide for the governor's mansion. Ads are multiplying on TV and radio and in our mailboxes. Current status according to realclearpolitics.com is Republican pork slayer Marilyn Musgrave leading tax dodging, student loan defaulting, bankruptcy filing, tax hiking liberal democrat Angie Paccione by single digits. (It shouldn't be this close.) The governor's race is even more frightening with gun-grabbing, plea bargaining DA Bill Ritter leading congressman Bob Beauprez by double digits. (Maybe they're only polling in urban centers?) The actual election should be a nail biter. Additional kudos go to Musgrave for being one of only 39 US Representatives (9% of the House) with a 100% rating from Americans for Tax Reform. Hat tip: Bob Beauprez campaign website.
Posted by JohnGalt at 11:29 AM
| Comments (1)
But jk thinks:
I hope it’s a Red November. Colorado lost both state houses to Democrats in 2004 and the gubernatorial race is looking pretty frightening. I hate to whack our beloved outgoing guv, but this underscores the folly of his supporting the “temporary” roll back of TABOR (TAxpayers Bill Of Rights). If Colorado goes all-Democrat, the limitations on taxation will blow away like a tumbleweed in Kit Carson County. August 29, 2006Colorado sheep dipA few weeks back I celebrated Rep. Marilyn Musgrave's (R-CO) position on Club for Growth's legislative pork scorecard. She voted fifteen times in nineteen chances to kill a pork bill in Congress. So imagine my surprise when my wife receives a political mailing that claims Musgrave "never saw a pork barrel project she didn't like." A prior mailing also charged, essentially, that Marilyn Musgrave and Tom Delay are the same person! So who is making these charges? A Republican group! They're called "Coloradoans for Life." Yeah, they're Republicans. Right? Aren't they? Well, it's hard to tell with this shadowy bunch but it ain't bloody likely. In addition to slamming Musgrave they've also mailed us to say what a louse Bob Beauprez (R for CO governor) is, and run radio spots to say just how peachy Angie Paccione (D for Musgrave's seat) is. But they've chosen "Coloradoans for Life" as their official name. Why? Because rural Coloradoans and country radio listeners are predominantly Republican and will ignore every word CFL says if they know who is saying it. And CFL sure isn't saying who they are anywhere on their web site. Ah, politics. Reminds me of the feed lot down the road.
Posted by JohnGalt at 3:18 PM
| Comments (2)
But johngalt thinks:
Trekmedic - I think this qualifies as a "Red November Initiative" post, but I'm no blog techie. Your post said, "Email me and I'll send you the blogroll" or something like that. I don't know what I'd do with a blogroll unless it had cinnamon and frosting. (Starbucks French Roast - straight up.) Posted by: johngalt at August 29, 2006 4:54 PM
But TrekMedic251 thinks:
(Sigh) Yeah, John, I'll add this story to my Red November Initiative! Posted by: TrekMedic251 at September 1, 2006 10:00 AMAugust 6, 2006CO-04: Marilyn Musgrave, "Pork Slayer"JK blogged a couple weeks ago about Club for Growth's legislative pork scorecard. Poor JK's representative, Mark Udall in CO's 2nd district, rarely saw a pork bill he would kill. Mine on the other hand, Marilyn Musgrave of CO-04, is a veritable "pork slayer" by comparison. Her score: 15 of 19. Who can say exactly why she failed to oppose four of the earmarks without in depth research (or maybe calling her office to ask) but who has time for that? A cursory analysis shows that three of them were agricultural earmarks (and hers is a heavily ag district) and a $4M "education research" sop. (I guess nobody is willing to take on the NEA.) Despite the heavy rural component in CO-04 it also includes the heavily liberal Larimer county, home of Colorado State University and the usual "progressive" suspects. In '04 Musgrave beat an established state Democrat, Stan Matsunaka, 51% to 45%. It's not a 'gimme' district for the GOP so it attracts national attention from the DNC. This year appears to be no different. There's already been no shortage of radio spots for Paccione, criticizing the "Bush/Musgrave" agenda on Iraq and illegal immigration. This weekend, Marliyn started shooting back. Her first radio spot cites Paccione's votes in the CO legislature for state tuition subsidies to illegal immigrant students, then informs us that ol' Angie defaulted on her very own student loans! The CO student loan board apparently took her to court and her solution was to declare bankruptcy. Ouch, that's gonna hurt!
Posted by JohnGalt at 2:59 PM
| Comments (1)
But jk thinks:
I thought you were in CO-07. Well done either way, but you have to leave a few of us moles back in Boulder County to see what they're up to... Posted by: jk at August 6, 2006 5:31 PMJuly 27, 2006Three out of NineteenClub for Growth has created a scorecard for every congressional representative, based on his/her votes on Rep. Flake's 19 contra-porcine amendments. Thanks to Congressman Jeff Flake's 19 anti-pork amendments, we now have every House member on record regarding their positions on earmarks. And if you expected Colorado's Second District (Boulder and environs) to be inclined more towards statism than taxpayer freedom -- well, give yourself a gold star. Democratic Scion and former Boulder mayor, Mark Udall, scores a big 3-for-19 on opposing pork.
Posted by John Kranz at 6:17 PM
May 22, 2006Fair Tax IIOne of my coworkers lives in Boulder, and is pretty hot on the fair tax. You might remember his response from Congressman Udall. He inquired about the fair tax of Senators Allard and Salazar. See the extended entry. Senator Allard:
I strongly support a simplified tax system. While I was a member of the Colorado legislature, we implemented a 5 percent flat tax for Colorado. We should take similar action on the Federal level. It is my belief that the tax code should be reformed to the point where American families can file their tax return on a one page sheet or post card. While this would involve the elimination of deductions and loopholes, it would be more than offset by a lower rate. While I support the concept of a flat tax, there are many details that would have to be worked out. In particular, I want to make certain that any reform is a benefit to the middle class. The vast majority of taxpayers are in the middle class, and they have borne the burden of the current system. Reform should also reward saving and investment. The "Fair Tax" legislation would implement a national sales tax. I am willing to consider this, and one aspect that I find appealing is the fact that this might permit the elimination of the IRS. However, mechanisms would have to be put in place to ensure that the collection burden on small business would not be excessive, and that the income tax could not be resurrected. The worst scenario would be for Americans to end up with the burdens of both an income tax and a national consumption tax. This is the unfortunate situation in many European nations. The first step towards a simpler, fairer system is elimination of the current tax code. It would be up to Congress to replace it with a simple, fair system that applies a low rate to all Americans. The replacement system must provide tax relief for working Americans without penalizing marriage or family, protect the rights of taxpayers, and reduce tax collection abuses. Finally, the replacement system must eliminate the bias against savings and investment and promote economic growth and job creation. Your thoughts will be helpful to me as tax issues are debated in the Senate. Senator Salazar:
As you know, S. 25, The Fair Tax Bill of 2005, was introduced in the Senate last year. This legislation would repeal the federal income tax, abolish the Internal Revenue Service, and establish a federal sales tax administered by the states. I agree with you that the Nation's tax code has become too complicated and burdensome. However, I do not believe that abolishing the IRS is a viable solution. I support making the President's tax cuts permanent for 98% of Americans. I will fight to close unfair tax loopholes that encourage big corporations to move their headquarters overseas to avoid paying taxes, and other unfair tax breaks, while supporting corporate tax changes that encourage domestic investment. At the same time, I will be a strong voice for fiscally conservative policies that don't saddle our children and grandchildren with even more debt. I will keep your views in mind as Congress debates tax reform policy this year.
Posted by AlexC at 5:22 PM
| Comments (1)
But jk thinks:
Wow. Right in the city limits, huh? I live in Lafayette (ten miles east) and it is scary enough driving in behind all the Volvos and Subarus. The Salazar comment saddened me. He is a decent Democrat, but it is an agonizing reminder what we lost when Pete Coors lost. The white haired gent you see strolling through the mountains in the commercials would have supported the Fair Tax, and would not have presumed to choose which 2% do not get to keep their Bush tax cuts. Posted by: jk at May 22, 2006 7:29 PM |