February 13, 2009

Is Obama Mencken's Electoral "Ideal?"

From wikiquote:

H. L. Mencken in the Baltimore Sun (26 July 1920)

When a candidate for public office faces the voters he does not face men of sense; he faces a mob of men whose chief distinguishing mark is the fact that they are quite incapable of weighing ideas, or even of comprehending any save the most elemental — men whose whole thinking is done in terms of emotion, and whose dominant emotion is dread of what they cannot understand. So confronted, the candidate must either bark with the pack or be lost... All the odds are on the man who is, intrinsically, the most devious and mediocre — the man who can most adeptly disperse the notion that his mind is a virtual vacuum.' The Presidency tends, year by year, to go to such men. As democracy is perfected, the office represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. We move toward a lofty ideal. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.

Every word of this seems a perfect depiction of the 2008 campaign and its result.

We still have the better part of four years to see if the current president is Mencken's "lofty ideal" personified. Something tells me we won't have to wait that long to find out.

Philosophy Posted by JohnGalt at February 13, 2009 7:20 PM

Great post! I really enjoy reading your blog. Keep up the good work.

I recently started a new blog that will be highlighting the dangerous advances of the secular progressive movement (pro-gay “rights”, pro-abortion, anti-religious freedoms, etc).

We’re looking to build a solid group of conservatives who’ll frequent our site regularly and contribute to some good discussions. The site gets updated daily with breaking news, so you’ll want to check back often, or you can just sign up for our News">http://religionandmorality.wordpress.com/feed/>News Feed.

If you’ll add us to your blogroll we’ll gladly add you to ours. Our blog is called Religion and Morality.

Thanks!

Posted by:
Chris Schandevel at February 14, 2009 4:12 PM | What do you think? [1]