November 16, 2008

Change 3.0

Awesome.

The candidate of hope and change has changed again.

Apparently, Obama has changed his position from his speech at AIPAC. In early June, he told the Israeli-supporting political action group that Jerusalem “must remain undivided,” drawing thunderous applause and roars of criticism later from Palestinian groups. Within hours, Obama retreated to the Bush administration position — that Jerusalem should be left to the two sides to negotiate in the final settlement.

Welcome to Obama 3.0 on Jerusalem. Now he has switched sides to the exact opposite of what he argued at AIPAC. One has to wonder what all of those Jewish voters who supported Obama will think of this new position on Israel’s borders and security, but somehow I doubt it would get thunderous applause at AIPAC.


Leading Israeli Prime Minister candidate Tzipi Livni supports the plan (the Saudi peace plan) in the general, while it is opposed by her rival for the position former Prime Minister (and Pennsylvania native) Benjamin Netanyahu.

2008 Posted by AlexC at November 16, 2008 11:57 AM

If I might be racist, anti-Semitic, and partisan in one comment, "One has to wonder" how Jewish voters can consistently, reflexively support Democratic candidates when the GOP has been such a better friend to Israel. At least African Americans get a little policy from the Ds that they mindlessly elect.

Did I leave anybody out? Yeah, those damned Armenians! What gives, huh?

Posted by: jk at November 16, 2008 12:59 PM

The Refugee had an interesting discussion with a Jewish friend (a Republican) before the election. That friend forwarded an article from the Cleveland Jewish News, that shed a great deal of light on the subject. The Refugee concluded that support of Israel is a threshold issue for American Jews. That is, if both candidates cross the threshold, then Israel is a non-issue and economic/social issues predominate (on which most Jews are overwhelmingly liberal). Obama crossed that threshold for the election, but it would be interesting to know how many Jewish voters would eventually like a Mulligan.

The Refugee asked another (non-practicing) Jewish friend if she thought Obama would militarally attack Iran if it attacked Israel. She said, "Oh, absolutely!" The Refugee wishes that he shared her confidence. However, he suspects that any response would be Clinton-like: three cruise missiles and an aspirin factory.

Posted by: Boulder Refugee at November 17, 2008 11:41 AM

Hey, I know a Jewish Repoublican. No doubt it is the same guy! We should all go out some night...

Posted by: jk at November 17, 2008 1:17 PM | What do you think? [3]