November 3, 2008

Socialism II

David Harsanyi -- gently and without malice -- accuses the Obama campaign of Socialism, because "when a candidate explicitly endorses a collectivist policy . . . well, words still have meaning, don't they?"

The proposition that government should take one group's lawfully earned profits and hand them to another group — not a collection of destitute or impaired Americans, mind you, but a still-vibrant middle class — is the foundational premise of Obama's fiscal policy.

It was Joe Biden, not long ago, who said (when he was still permitted to speak in public) that, "We want to take money and put it back in the pocket of middle-class people." The only entity that "takes" money from the middle class or any class for that matter, is the Internal Revenue Service. Other than that, there is nothing to give back.


It's an excellent read, and not a bad article to mail to an undecided on the last day of the campaign. This is the argument I wish we had been having from the conventions on.

2008 Posted by John Kranz at November 3, 2008 12:12 PM

My barber came to a very similar conclusion - does this mean she should be an economist or a political analyst? See what I mean:

The Wisdom of a Barber

In my book, this just means that she's learned from her life experiences what any American who received a passing grade in high-school Civics should know. And, by the way, Jenny is also a great barber...

Posted by: Keith at November 3, 2008 1:18 PM | What do you think? [1]