September 26, 2008Abject Terror of the DayI'm a Kudlow optimist who is bullish on the long term prospects of the American economy. And I'm not quaking in my boots, selling stock, or loading up on water and ammunition. But I have real concerns about the near term economy and am willing to suspend ideology if it means averting a liquidity crisis. There's no shortage of information or clever arguments for both sides. Here are four for mine, which is: the potential cost of doing nothing is too great, even a bad plan might calm markets; even the government will not lose the whole $700B; Secretary Paulson is as trustworthy to me as any of our 535 economists in chief, far more so than 532 of them. 1) Caterpillar’s 325 bps premium for financing over a similar loan just a few months ago. This is not Joe's Widgets, this is for CAT corporate debt. 2) Friend of a friend and long-time trusted commercial real estate developer is trying to refinance a $4 Million property and cannot get a loan of $900K. 3) A letter to Mankiw: A LOT of payrolls get paid at the end of the month. The next for many companies is September 30. Three different people with hugely relevant knowledge said to me today words to the effect of: "Why don't your economist buddies want 4) Megan McArdle captures my sentiment: Again, no one knows. Not $700 billion--that's the amount we're paying for distressed assets, some of which will yield profits. The entire portfolio of fire sale securities may lose money, but it's unlikely to be anything close to the entire amount. Me either. Give the bald guy the damn money. Economics and Markets Posted by jk at September 26, 2008 12:40 PM |
First of all, let's be clear: one can never have too much ammunition!
The problem, as you point out, is that it's impossible to accurately assess the value of these loans in the short period of time available. The only way to be sure that this does not become a huge give-away is to make sure the financial institutions involved have plenty of skin in the game. The Refugee has a moderate amount of faith in House Republicans, who seem to have suddenly rediscovered a principled spine, to drive a hard bargain.
Posted by: Boulder Refugee at September 26, 2008 3:27 PMThere used to be, in this country, a reliable and accurate way to assess the value of property. Old-timers called it "the free market."
Posted by: johngalt at September 28, 2008 2:30 AM | What do you think? [2]