July 16, 2008

New Communist Manifesto

There's a problem with Reagan's bloodless victory in the Cold War - all of the communists were free to go elsewhere and carry on their life's work. Their latest manifesto (that I'm aware of) is called: Agenda 21.

To wit: The 27 Principles of the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development.

A few examples:

Principle 1 -

"Human beings are at the centre of concerns for sustainable development. They are entitled to a healthy and productive life in harmony with nature."

And all other rights not hereby enumerated are at risk.

Principle 2 -

"States have, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the principles of international law, the sovereign right to exploit their own resources pursuant to their own environmental and developmental policies, and the responsibility to ensure that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to the environment of other States or of areas beyond the limits of national jurisdiction."

Global Warming anyone?

Principle 3 -

"The right to development must be fulfilled so as to equitably meet developmental and environmental needs of present and future generations."

Natural resources (fossil fuels) must be left in the ground for use by future generations. And future generations must leave it for those that follow them. And so on.

(I'm not sure I can take much more of this.)

Principle 4 -

"In order to achieve sustainable development, environmental protection shall constitute an integral part of the development process and cannot be considered in isolation from it."

Thou shalt not create buildings which trample a single plant or insect.

(Let's skip ahead a bit.)

Principle 15 -

"In order to protect the environment, the precautionary approach shall be widely applied by States according to their capabilities. Where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation."

"Don't know where were goin' but there's no use bein' late!"

Principle 20 -

Women have a vital role in environmental management and development. Their full participation is therefore essential to achieve sustainable development.

Perhaps women deserve government salaries for living sustainably (i.e. without engaging in commerce.)

Principle 24 -

"Warfare is inherently destructive of sustainable development. States shall therefore respect international law providing protection for the environment in times of armed conflict and cooperate in its further development, as necessary."

"Hey Joe, where you goin' with that grenade in your hand?" Did you get an EIS first?

Principle 25 -

"Peace, development and environmental protection are interdependent and indivisible."

Aw shucks, ain't that nice?

Principle 26 -

"States shall resolve all their environmental disputes peacefully and by appropriate means in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations."

Kumbaya.

Principle 27 -

"States and people shall cooperate in good faith and in a spirit of partnership in the fulfilment of the principles embodied in this Declaration and in the further development of international law in the field of sustainable development."

Thus shall it be. Amen.

Think none of this will ever effect you? My brother learned differently when he applied for a building permit in Boulder County.

Sustainability in Land Use in Boulder County

What is sustainability? (Notice that Boulder County now has a second web presence, in the .org domain.) Oy.

From the other side Posted by JohnGalt at July 16, 2008 3:18 PM

And how is your brother's sweatshop assault weapons facility coming along? I think it's a great idea.

Love this from the Boulder site:

But a truly "sustainable" community goes far beyond basic energy efficiency and pollution reduction. A sustainable community provides for all the needs of its inhabitants (including people, animals and habitats). This includes protecting open spaces, natural habitats and landscapes; ensuring access to basic human needs such as food, housing and health care; encouraging an active community involvement in social, political and community activities; and providing the every-day services that make daily tasks possible - services such as maintaining transportation routes and ensuring fair, accurate, democratic elections.

Who needs life, liberty, and the pursuit of happines when you got all that?

Posted by: jk at July 16, 2008 5:14 PM

As to your main point, the problem is not the bloodless destruction of Communism, Jay Nordlinger at National Review has frequently said that the problem is that there was no Nuremberg. There should have been war crime trials and a few folks hung.

Posted by: jk at July 16, 2008 5:18 PM

Don't you wish for the days when we ostracized communists at home, and shot (at) them abroad?

Good thing you didn't go through the whole thing. Onion is blocked at work, and I would have vomited had I read them all.

"shall therefore respect international law providing protection for the environment in times of armed conflict"

IOW words, scorched earth for me, but not for thee!

Posted by: Perry Eidelbus at July 17, 2008 8:48 AM

Now you know why I'm a Boulder refugee.

Posted by: Boulder Refugee at July 17, 2008 2:31 PM

This helps everyone else understand BR, but I already knew. I'm a Boulder refugee myself, now living in Weld County after 17 years (plus 4 more years of college) living in not just the county, but the city of Boulder.

With a Longmont mailing address my brother held out longer than we did, but he'll be next.

Posted by: johngalt at July 17, 2008 3:26 PM | What do you think? [5]