Not Everybody Loves Firefly?
Merciful Zeus! This woman doesn't like Firefly, nor Joss Whedon. And she has some pretty unusual views about sex.
I have to say that now that I have subjected myself to the horror that is Firefly, I really am beyond worried about how much men hate us, given that this was written by a man who calls himself a feminist.
I find much of Joss Whedon’s work to be heavily influenced by pornography, and pornographic humour. While I would argue that there are some aspects of Buffy: The Vampire Slayer that are feminist and progressive, there is much that isn’t and I find it highly problematic that there are many very woman-hating messages contained within a show that purports itself as feminism. But Firefly takes misogyny to a new level of terrifying. I am really, really worried that women can call the man who made this show a feminist.
For myself, I’m not sure that I will recover from the shock of watching the malicious way in which Joss stripped his female characters of their integrity, the pleasure he seemed to take from showing potentially powerful women bashed, the way he gleefully demonized female power and selfhood and smashed women into little bits, male fists in women’s faces, male voices drowning out our words.
There is so much hatred towards women contained within the scripts and action of the series that I doubt very much that this post will even begin to cover it.
But she tries. She is disturbed that Zoe calls a superior officer "Sir," she counts the number of times men talk vs. women, and she is, let's say, generally unaccepting of Inara's occupation: For those who don't watch, Inara is a "Companion:" a highly paid courtesan who chooses her own clients and is held in such esteem by society that her presence as a tenant on the ship opens many doors for the ship and crew. She is the only respectable member of Serenity.
It is clear from the outset that a large part of Inara’s service involves addressing issues of male inadequacy and fulfilling many other emotional needs of her clients. The ability to do this IS a resource and it is therefore a service that Inara must perform. BUT Inara services all of the male passengers and the Captain in this way. She also services Kaylee but the relationship between them is a little more reciprocal. In any case, Mal makes it pretty obvious that he expects his emotional needs to be serviced by Inara and she willingly obliges. Mal also allows the male passengers to demand her emotional services and does not tell them to stop, despite the terms of his agreement with Inara. Inara is not paid by any of these men for her time, energy and emotional support.
Hat-tip: Galley Slaves. Jonathan V. Last
worries that it is a put on (as does Ace of Spades in a
funny post). Maybe I have lived in Boulder County too long, but none of this lacks verisimilitude for me.
I don't care, I'm still free. You can't take the sky from me.
Posted by jk at March 28, 2008 1:29 PM
Good Lord, that woman is loony.
The characters there are more than the single dimension she mentions. ie Zoe calling a superior officer "sir" AND walking the fine yet straight line of being the stronger person within her marriage without shame, yet knowingly and lovingly dealing with Wash's situation.
Or Inara being the most respected on the ship though a courtesan. Different times, different times.
She mentions Mal being sexist, but he's more of a gruff captain. It's his ship, it's his crew, things go his way and that's that. He can tell his mechanic she's too cheerful and should shutup. She doesn't "take it" or feel "threatened". She goes about her merry way like any woman with good humor would do.
Sheesh.....
That chick is yet another example of why feminism is not respected. When it should be the simple equation of equal pay for equal work.
Good Lord, that woman is loony.
The characters there are more than the single dimension she mentions. ie Zoe calling a superior officer "sir" AND walking the fine yet straight line of being the stronger person within her marriage without shame, yet knowingly and lovingly dealing with Wash's situation.
Or Inara being the most respected on the ship though a courtesan. Different times, different times.
She mentions Mal being sexist, but he's more of a gruff captain. It's his ship, it's his crew, things go his way and that's that. He can tell his mechanic she's too cheerful and should shutup. She doesn't "take it" or feel "threatened". She goes about her merry way like any woman with good humor would do.
Sheesh.....
Posted by: Terri at March 28, 2008 6:24 PMThat chick is yet another example of why feminism is not respected. When it should be the simple equation of equal pay for equal work.
Equal pay for women? Terri, let's not go off the handle into a lot of crazy talk around here...
I laugh because I read a lot of lit-crit on Buffy and Angel, 80% of which is written by academic women with strong feminist leanings. (Yes, Ma'am, perhaps a sword is phallic -- but perhaps spherical weapons are less efficacious for stabbing?) I am used to Whedon being praised.
I'm deciding whether to share this essay with my ultra-feminist niece whom I've recently sired (She's halfway through Season 2 at last report).
Posted by: jk at March 28, 2008 6:52 PMBut Whedon wrecked it with "Serenity." Too many character "changes" shall we say?
Posted by: TrekMedic251 at March 30, 2008 9:59 AMHuh. I liked Serenity. As I've said, I would have preferred a few more TV episodes to the big budget movie, but I liked it.
Posted by: jk at March 30, 2008 12:09 PM | What do you think? [4]