Obama Foriegn Policy
(Like everything else, barely distinguishable from Senator Clinton's)
1) Bomb sovereign allies without approval;
2) Abrogate commitments in the Middle East;
3) Piss off trading partners;
4) "Restore America's Standing in the World!"
Daniel Drezner notes that Canada and Mexico are not so keen on "renegotiating" NAFTA, and links to an FT story:(WARNING: British spelling)
Arturo Sarukhan, Mexico’s ambassador to the US, told the Financial Times that the US, Canada and Mexico had all benefited from Nafta and warned against reopening negotiations.
“Mexico does not support reopening Nafta,” he said. “It would be like throwing a monkey wrench into the engine of North American competitiveness.”
Mexican diplomats believe a renegotiation could resurrect the commercial disputes and barriers to trade that the agreement itself was designed to overcome.
Jim Flaherty, Canada’s finance minister, also expressed “concern” about the remarks by the Democratic candidates.
“Nafta is a tremendous benefit to Americans and perhaps the [candidates] have not had the opportunity to familiarise themselves with the benefit to Americans and the American economy of Nafta,” he said.
Senator Clinton assured, in a recent debate, that "the world will breathe a sign of relief when George Bush leaves office." I'm not sure that's as universal as her health care mandates.
2008
Posted by jk at February 28, 2008 12:27 PM
5) Unilaterally invade Iraq if al Qaeda establishes bases there, unless they've already done so, in which case, unilaterally abandon Iraq to al Qaeda. [The "eat cake and still have it" policy to prove he's not a metrosexual.]
5) Unilaterally invade Iraq if al Qaeda establishes bases there, unless they've already done so, in which case, unilaterally abandon Iraq to al Qaeda. [The "eat cake and still have it" policy to prove he's not a metrosexual.]
Posted by: johngalt at February 28, 2008 3:25 PM | What do you think? [1]