November 27, 2007Pharma Sector Bad, Journalists Good."If you can't get a drug on the market with that kind of data, we should stop developing drugs."So says a Duke University Cardiologist about Eli Lilly's TRITON trial. He is quoted in a guest editorial in the WSJ from Eli Lilly CEO Sidney Taurel. I have suggested that people who choose to invest in or directly try to the improve human life through technology face opposition from politicians, trial lawyers, luddites, and a burdensome government approvals process. Taurel adds journalists to that list. When Lilly stopped a trial to ensure patient safety, the press smelled blood in the water: When it comes to describing the benefits and risks of prescription drugs, the hyper-competitive, around-the-clock media is rarely at its best. Call the following a case study in the challenge of doing right by doctors and patients -- in spite of the need to feed the media beast with copy. It's a sad story that follows. Six billion in market capitalization (That equals six million little plastic bracelets, folks).and loss of investor confidence in a promising new compound. Pharmaceuticals Posted by jk at November 27, 2007 7:12 PM |
My friend's wife is a doctor who works for a big Pharma. As we watch the Eagles flail helplessly across the field, she spends time reading the reports that come back from clinical trials (she's involved in patient safety). For people with MDs and PhDs, they can sometimes be as dumb as dirt when it comes to writing a detailed report.
It amazes me how much time and energy is wasted having to ask over and again for clarification about one paragraph in a 10-page report!
Posted by: TrekMedic251 at November 27, 2007 10:37 PM | What do you think? [1]