July 16, 2007Long Term Freedom BullArguments with purist libertarians have spiked around here with cogent comments from Perry Eidlebus and Harrison Bergeron. A sizable part of my argument is that liberty is not as popular as many purists think. There are just not enough laissez faire voters to elect candidates or enact some of the legislation we would prefer. Do not infer that I am pessimistic. I am very worried about American liberty in the near term. An unpopular war is associated with those would liberalize trade and lower taxes, recent GOP Congressional majorities have behaved poorly and without principle, and the 60's
The American Magazine I was shilling in a previous post has Japan on the cover. While we were all watching China, The world's second largest economy freed itself from decades of collectivism and government intervention. Under PM Koizumi and Abe, labor's hold has been loosened, government intervention reduced, and growth is rebounding. Another story details liberalization in -- sit down -- Sweden! They are selling off the government run and owned company that makes Absolut Vodka. Add the election of Sarkozy in France, Merkel in Germany, a wave of tax cutting across Europe, freedom may be in good hands while its shining light flickers. |
The freedom message is strong and there is always hope for the future. For example, a new paper in the Michigan Law Review makes the case that another jk, J.K. Rowling, extols the virtues of freedom and libertarianism in her Harry Potter series.
Posted by: Harrison Bergeron at July 16, 2007 5:17 PM | What do you think? [1]