June 30, 2007Near MissI have never seen Keith Oberman before. I have read about him, but didn't get the full KO Experience until I saw this YouTube clip on HotAir (Hat-tip: Insty I think) He interviews a former CIA guy (Larry Johnson, who seems to be well known around the blogosphere as well -- I need to get out more). Johnson asserts that the London car bombs would have made a lot of noise but were unlikely to hurt anybody unless they were inside the car with the bomb. He and Oberman then go on a joint tirade about why we're in Iraq and why the London bomb gets more attention than bombs in Baghdad. I'll cede that petrol and propane and nails seem less sophisticated than Iranian IEDs. But it plays into a media narrative that every foiled plot was "a bunch of jokers," "dropouts from al Qaeda," &c. The war isn't really real, terrorists aren't dangerous, we've been at war with Eurasia all along... Imagine that 9/11 had been foiled. What a bunch of losers! Get this, they had box cutters. And they thought they would take over the plane and -- wait for it -- take over the cockpit and fly these planes into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon! What a bunch of bozos -- clearly, we have nothing to fear from the likes of these losers. |
Don't forget the spent the nights before going to tittie bars!
Posted by: AlexC at June 30, 2007 10:35 PMI am guessing that the reason a car bomb in London gets more publicity than a car bomb in Baghdad is because there isn't a war going on in London.
Posted by: Harrison Bergeron at July 1, 2007 5:40 PMYou are never going to get invited on Keith Oberman's show using goofy-ass logic like that. (Damn, I said "Ass.")
Posted by: jk at July 1, 2007 8:13 PM | What do you think? [3]