June 1, 2007

Andrew Sullivan With Better Hair

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

If I may borrow Mr. Jefferson's words, it is time that I dissolve my political bands with Peggy Noonan.

WHEREAS, Ms. Noonan is a gifted writer and is herein recognized as an eloquent voice for the Reagan Wing of the Republican Party,

WHEREAS, Ms, Noonan has written several exceptional books. "What I Saw at the Revolution" being jk's favorite book to explain Republican ideas to moderates, "A Cross, A Heart and a Flag" being a touching look at post-9/11 America, and "The Case Against Hillary Clinton" being perhaps the best book about the Clinton Years and impeachment,

NEVERTHELESS, Ms. Noonan has now completely descended into the overly personal, hectoring style of punditry that she has flirted with for several years. Her elitist views have come further out on display and she has resorted to personal attacks against those with whom she differs.

I introduce into evidence Noonan's column of Friday, June 1, 2007. After berating the White House for "name-calling," she calls then all hacks.

The beginning of my own sense of separation from the Bush administration came in January 2005, when the president declared that it is now the policy of the United States to eradicate tyranny in the world, and that the survival of American liberty is dependent on the liberty of every other nation. This was at once so utopian and so aggressive that it shocked me. For others the beginning of distance might have been Katrina and the incompetence it revealed, or the depth of the mishandling and misjudgments of Iraq.

What I came in time to believe is that the great shortcoming of this White House, the great thing it is missing, is simple wisdom. Just wisdom--a sense that they did not invent history, that this moment is not all there is, that man has lived a long time and there are things that are true of him, that maturity is not the same thing as cowardice, that personal loyalty is not a good enough reason to put anyone in charge of anything, that the way it works in politics is a friend becomes a loyalist becomes a hack, and actually at this point in history we don't need hacks.


Pundits need not preserve fealty or obeisance to the administration, but the public "I separated with them on this date, because of ..." is too personal, and should be used cautiously because of the ammunition it provides to political opponents.

Ms. Noonan lunches at trendy restaurants with other Manhattenites. Like Sullivan, I do not see it as courageous to stop defending your principles and to assume the views of others in your peer group. This has been a long time coming, but I declare my Independence from the bands of Ms. Noonan. I wish her well.

President Bush Posted by jk at June 1, 2007 12:09 PM

As I started reading this I thought for sure the column that led you to "separate with [Noonan] on this date, because of..." was this one.

"We should close our borders. We should do whatever it takes to close them tight and solid. Will that take the Army? Then send the Army. Does it mean building a wall? Then build a wall, but the wall must have doors, which can be opened a little or a lot down the road once we know where we are."

Posted by: johngalt at June 1, 2007 4:15 PM

It wasn't just he Stamp Act...

There have been hundreds of columns which disturb me. The one you cite I disagree with but it is honest punditry. She whacks the White House a little hard for my tastes, but she voices an idea I disagree with, with her characteristic eloquence.

The traits that have worn me like running water on stone are her elitism, which disturbed me even as I admired her highly, and a more recent enmity with her opponents that I find to be just like Andrew Sullivan. Pop psychology is not my beat but it seems that both feel betrayed by former allies and have chosen to lash out irrationally.

What also inspired this post -- but it was getting too long already -- was a comparison between Noonan and Kim Strassel. Strassel may not have Noonan's poetry, but she is an exceptional writer. The thesis of the post was almost that the torch was being passed from a now-frequently-unhinged Peggy Noonan to a clear voiced Strassel.

Read Strassel's piece on the immigration. It's cleaner and crisper (and removes stubborn stains from even the most delicate fabrics).

Posted by: jk at June 2, 2007 12:07 PM | What do you think? [2]