March 22, 2007It Ain't FairFirst, a joke... A man died and went to heaven. As he stood in front of St.Peter at the Pearly Gates, he saw a huge wall of clocks behind him. The Hill (not Hillary)... Former President Bill Clinton yesterday complained that “it’s just not fair” the way his wife, presidential candidate Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.), is being depicted for her controversial Iraq war vote. Of all things that give me the chills about a second Clinton presidency, it's the aforementioned spinning. He said he had re-read the Iraq resolution last week, and that his wife had voted only for “coercive inspections.” Clinton justified his wife’s refusal to apologize for her vote by explaining that she was acting out of concern that future presidents might need similar language authorizing “coercive inspections to avoid conflict.” Ahem... pardon my language. The title of the f*cking resolution is "Joint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq. I guess you could technically argue that it doesn't say "invade Iraq," but it certainly says it's possible... and that's without even reading the text. Besides, the only reason the coercive inspections were even happening were the thousands of American soldiers massing in Saudi Arabia. Nobody called that 2002 resolution anything but the war declaration. Grr. Who is she kidding? Senator Kerry famously quipped "I voted for it, before I voted against it!" when defending his vote. Who is fooled by the triangulation? 2008 Race Posted by AlexC at March 22, 2007 11:41 PM |
Amen, the old 2-for-1 deal is more freighting today than it was in 1992.
Give her the escape hatch, even. What do these people think would have been accomplished with her coercive inspections? How can you possibly and plausibly describe a good outcome that does not involve coalition boots on the ground?
Posted by: jk at March 23, 2007 10:31 AM | What do you think? [1]