December 30, 2006Fractals, Weather, and ClimateI'll stop boring my Keystone state friends with Colorado weather reports, though I'll give a quiet shout out to a Nebraska reader who may be seeing our storm today. That last foot we were supposed to get today is now predicted to be 2-4" and I doubt we'll get that (always look at the first differential of the forecast -- if they're backing off grab the swim trunks, if they're increasing, fill the car with gas). It seems a puff of air from out West will keep the storm from the mountains and prevent the "upslope" pattern where a storm gets pushed against the hills and drops its load. My toy car will be beached a few more days, but what the TV newscasters call "The Blizzard of 2006: II" has moved out to the eastern plains. I will aggravate the climate change faithful with this observation, but hear me out. Being a math geek, I remember James Gleick's Chaos. Of the three pop math books I can think of, Chaos was the biggest seller. It introduced much of America to fractals, chaos theory, and the butterfly effect. Old Chris what's-his-name on Fox31 weather is a smart fellow with a lot of shiny equipment. He was convinced that we were in store for another foot-plus today. One little breeze from the West and it's not to be. The fact is there are too many variables to predict weather. This is obvious to anybody who lives in front of the mountains. They create a chaotic interstice for moving weather that precludes prediction. "But that is weather, jk. Weather is capricious. Climate is not," the dissenter points out. This is fair although the next sentence about "You #%$^%^ink stupid Republicans!" goes too far. But what if climate is just as capricious? The really interesting thing about fractals is their repeatability at different scales. Trace a foot of coastline and a mile of coastline and they look the same. A friend had a record of nature sounds which sounded exactly the same at 16, 33 1/3, or 45 RPM. I could never figure that out until I read the Gleick book. I posit that climate is equally and similarly capricious to weather, if you change the scale of the graph from days to millennia. A moth only lives for a day -- don't you figure the VP Al Gore moths worry about "global darking" when night falls? |
I came back to comment here that it seemed like more fun when we had liberals, err, "centrists" who would take on positions such as these. "We've driven them all off with our brilliant and unassailable counterarguments," thought I.
No, JK had just inadvertently disabled comments!
Posted by: johngalt at December 31, 2006 10:11 PMI aggressively recruit Democrat-leaning bloggers because they don't last very long. I know Silence has a new job and hope he'll wander back when time permits. I might mail him this post.
I hate to post uncharitable thoughts on New Year's Day, but I find it extremely difficult to engage with interested and intelligent folks who do not vote like me. I know they're out there, but the ones I know have little interest in discussion.
Let me know when there are comment problems. The standard ThreeSources comment policy is:
-- You have to type in the dopey password that shows on the comment page. It changes every day.
-- I run a SQL script to close comments on posts that are more than seven days old. I run that when I feel like it. You might find old legal posts around but you can count on seven days of commenting.
-- A Spam filter holds a comment with three or more links until an administrator publishes it. I think AlexC, JohnGalt and I all have rights to approve.
All of these exist -- not to stifle dissent -- but to avoid porn merchants and Viagra peddlers who "Spam-bot" blog comments to increase their search engine ranking.
Mail jk [at] threesources [dot] com if you encounter something outside these rules and I will look at it.
Posted by: jk at January 1, 2007 12:53 PMMea maxima culpa. I used evil Microsoft T-SQL on a Linux MySQL database and closed comments on the wrong wrong set of posts. Lucky I didn't destroy the entire fabric of space-time...
Posted by: jk at January 2, 2007 1:09 PM | What do you think? [3]