December 22, 2006Now a Word Against EnforcementFull of Christmas Spirit, I thought I mightn't start a squabble about immigration on December 22. Naaah: The lead editorial (free link) questions the cost benefit ratio of the immigration raids on the Swift meatpacking plants. Immigration restrictionists would have us believe that harassing businesses like Swift, the world's second-largest beef and pork processor, helps make America safer. But so far the Swift raids haven't uncovered any al Qaeda cells, merely a bunch of hard-working people trying to feed their families. The operation involved more than 1,000 federal agents in six states. And of Swift's 15,000 or so employees, a grand total of 144 have been charged to date with misidentifying themselves to get hired. I suppose that enforcing the law is its own good and I do not post this to criticize. I post this to rebut those who say that it should be the responsibility of employers to enforce our immigration laws. It seems that Swift tried. There's a common notion that businesses seek out illegal aliens to employ. So it's also worth noting that since 1997 Swift has voluntarily participated in a government program for vetting new hires known as Basic Pilot. Under this system, the names and Social Security numbers of all job applicants are checked against a federal database. Which is to say that the presence of illegal workers at Swift is not the result of a company's indifference to the rule of law. It's the result of a flawed government system for determining who's eligible to work here. A few years ago Swift's management attempted to go even further than Basic Pilot to screen job applicants, only to be sued by the Justice Department for employment discrimination in 2001. Full of hope for the season (that's twice he's said "full of it..."), this might be a big plus for having a Democratic 110th Congress.
Merry Christmas ThreeSourcers! Immigration Posted by jk at December 22, 2006 4:02 PM |