September 22, 2006House's "Last Gasp Measures" on ImmigrationThe WSJ editorial page and a beloved blog brother are deriding the efforts of republicans in the House of Representatives to "do something about this immigration problem about which they've whipped everybody up." FNC's Major Garrett gave a detailed report on events in the legislative body during Thursday's 'Special Report with Brit Hume.' Here are the highlights - Republicans "steamrolled" three bills through the House: "Democrats say the bills have little chance of becoming law." Republicans Hastert and Boener presented a chart entitled, "House Republicans' Border Security Now September Agenda" which listed the following bullet points: Personally, I fail to see how any of these individual measures are "bad politics, bad economics" or "bad imagery." Better yet, taken as a whole they give the appearance of a "comprehensive" approach. While detractors share common cause with representatives John Conyers and Sheila Jackson Lee who decry the failure to pass "comprehensive immigration reform," the three house bills passed today with large bipartisan margins, as Democrats hasten to put themselves on the politically popular side of these obvious steps. Bill 1- Passed unanimously. Bill 2- Passed with 100 democrat "yea" votes. Bill 3- Passed with 62 democrats piling on. The three bills have no companions in the Senate, but House leadership hopes to roll them into the "must pass" Homeland Security spending bill scheduled for hill action next week. This is shaping up to be quite a mighty "gasp." And don't forget the 700-mile border fence the house already approved, which is also scheduled for a Senate vote next week. Immigration Internecine Politics Posted by JohnGalt at September 22, 2006 12:28 AM |
"Democrats say the bills have little chance of becoming law."
The Dems said that,.and YOU believed them???
Posted by: TrekMedic251 at September 22, 2006 9:53 AMAll of these measures would be good politics, good economics, and good imagery were they combined with some legislation which would give American business the labor it requires and provide a way for those honest laborers to cross and take those jobs. Then it would be a sign of a secure America that welcomes workers but not lawbreakers.
I'm proud to stand with Reps. Conyers and Lee but I suspect their motives are different than mine.
The old line is that a House majority can pass a ham sandwich. The key has always been, is, and will remain the flexibility of the House in conference. As they now seem to confuse intransigence with toughness, I am not confident.
Posted by: jk at September 22, 2006 10:14 AMjk,..America has plenty of labor out there. Its up to the Dems to get them off the welfare addiction and the so-called "urban leaders" to stop telling them welfare is better than working for "da man!"
Posted by: TrekMedic251 at September 22, 2006 12:24 PM | What do you think? [3]