September 15, 2006Sharansky & IranThreesources' favorite Natan Sharansky has a piece up in the La Times discussing non-state actors and their patrons. It's a "must read the whole thing in it's entirety" kind of commentary.
Considering the apocalyptic fanaticism of Iran's leader, it is an open question whether the current regime in Tehran is capable of being deterred through the threat of mutually assured destruction. But given how the world has responded to Hezbollah, the point may be academic. For surely Iran would be better served by using proxies to wage a nuclear war against Israel. And if there is no accountability, why stop with Israel? The road to a suitcase bomb in Tel Aviv, Paris or New York just got a whole lot shorter. |