June 14, 2006

Evils of Capitalism

Former dirty commie hippie turned CEO.

    At the time I started my business, the Left had taught me that business and capitalism were based on exploitation: exploitation of consumers, workers, society, and the environment. I believed that "profit" was a necessary evil at best, and certainly not a desirable goal for society as a whole. However, becoming an entrepreneur completely changed my life. Everything I believed about business was proven to be wrong.

    The most important thing I learned about business in my first year was that business wasn't based on exploitation or coercion at all. Instead I realized that business is based on voluntary cooperation. No one is forced to trade with a business; customers have competitive alternatives in the market place; employees have competitive alternatives for their labor; investors have different alternatives and places to invest their capital. Investors, labor, management, suppliers — they all need to cooperate to create value for their customers. If they do, then any realized profit can be divided amongst the creators of the value through competitive market dynamics.

    In other words, business is not a zero-sum game with a winner and loser. It is a win, win, win, win game — and I really like that. However, I discovered despite my idealism that our customers thought our prices were too high, our employees thought they were underpaid, the vendors would not give us large discounts, the community was forever clamoring for donations, and the government was slapping us with endless fees, licenses, fines, and taxes.


On the road to Damascus, do any individuals go from capitalist to socialist? It seems like it's a one way valve.

I want to copy and paste the whole thing, but it's better if you just go read the whole thing.

Economics and Markets Posted by AlexC at June 14, 2006 10:41 AM

Excellent!

Sadly, folks like Maria Cantwell and George Soros and John Corzine do go the other way -- after they have made their money in a free market, they pull up the drawbridges to keep the hoi polloi from joining them.

Posted by: jk at June 14, 2006 1:02 PM

I would suggest that each of us writes a 250-500 word post on this (The Randians can have more :). Where we agree, where we diverge. He has really nailed many of the questions I have about where we converge.

Posted by: jk at June 14, 2006 1:21 PM

Hear hear! (and from the Left no less) Buy that man a beer (or 17)! I fear where the Right wants to take us, and I know they can accomplish it. I want what the Left espouses (for the most part) but know they have no concept of how to get there. What we need to do is create and empower the Middle.

Posted by: silence dogood at June 14, 2006 2:50 PM

Silence, you are ThreeSources own Morton Kondracke -- and I say that as a huge compliment!

I don't trust the middle. I see it populated with You and Mort, but then 200,000,000 who lack strong views, ideas, or conviction. Rather than empower the Brangelina worshippers, I would like to realign the parties to better suit the likes of Mackey and Craig's List's Craig Newmark. Both of these have impressed me with matching the idealism of the left with the proven Hayekian mechanisms of the right.

Posted by: jk at June 14, 2006 3:38 PM | What do you think? [4]