March 27, 2006The Immigration RalliesMickey Kaus did great reporting on the pro-immigration rallies in L.A. He predicted an anti-immigrant backlash and caught the LA Times papering over the large numbers of Mexican flags in the parade. In the spirit of fairness, I provide a link to this coverage. In Kaus's spirit of fairness, he provides a link to a Marc Cooper posting that disagrees. Much as I dig the Mickster, I have to go with Cooper on this one. I'm struck by several aspects of this story. Primarily by the way neither party can properly get a hold of this issue. Demographics and global economics are simply racing ahead of any practical political response. The Republicans are deeply divided over the issue. Even as the half-million or so were marching in the streets Saturday, President Bush was on the radio more or less endorsing the protestors' two key demands: that a legal channel be created for the immigration already happening and that some legal acknowledgement be given to the 12 million "illegals" already living here. Viva Bush! The other point is that I refuse to back away from my contention that compromise is possible. I think you can increase enforcement and provide a legal channel and make most of the people happy. In the Kausian spirit of fairness, I will include another link. Arnold Kling, whom I respect greatly, seems to minimize the economic benefits of immigration (which I claim). Kling is not against me by any stretch, but he is not quite so sure about the economic benefits: I believe that illegal immigrants bring relatively little economic benefit and cause relatively little economic harm. I believe that there are substitutes readily available for the work done by illegal immigrants. Legal residents could do some of the work. Other labor could be replaced by capital or by alternative production techniques. By the same token, because there are many substitutes available for unskilled labor, the salvation of American workers does not lie in immigration restrictions. Kling says "The Battle of the Borders is a distraction. While he is on my side on immigration, outsourcing, and foreign ownership of US Assets, (for all three), he thinks other issues are more worthy of effort -- on both sides. Immigration Posted by jk at March 27, 2006 1:49 PM |
"Other issues are more worthy of effort." True. Let me offer some candidates:
I don't oppose illegal immigrants collecting entitlements from our welfare state, I oppose ANYBODY collecting entitlements from our welfare state. Dismantle it.
I don't fear illegal immigrants voting to expand the welfare state to its natural end in a Marxist dystopia, I fear ANYBODY voting to do so. Repeal the 16th amendment.
I'm not concerned about illegal immigrants flaunting the laws that prohibit their pursuit of the American Dream on American soil, I'm concerned about ANYBODY flaunting ANY law. Eliminate subjective, immoral and unenforceable laws and eradicate the cancers that threaten the efficacy of our legal system; make punishment as certain as humanly possible.
And while I'm on a roll, how insane is it that young inner city gangster wannabes actually STRIVE to go to prison in order to make their bones for the criminal drug and prostitution industry? Whatever's going on in our prisons ain't gettin' it done.
Posted by: johngalt at March 27, 2006 3:22 PMAnd After we end all welfare and eliminate taxation, we can start on the really important things...
Posted by: jk at March 27, 2006 6:48 PMHey, if it was easy it would have been done by now!
My idealistic goals are an easy mark for flippancy but I have to correct you on one point. There was plenty of taxation prior to the 16th Amendment and there always will be. I'm merely asking to repeal the anti-Constitutional revision that allowed taxation "without regard to the enumeration of the several states" or, some animals get taxed more than others.
Posted by: johngalt at March 27, 2006 11:28 PMIt's a far cop, guv! I considered your taxation point after I posted, you are right.
The flippancy is not so much about the scope of your goals -- I dig that. I am flip because you are always willing to postpone immigration reform until you have eradicated welfare. The interrelation is clear, but you have effectively put yourself out of an important debate.
"I'll clean the garage as soon as I learn to teleport matter." Yes, that would help but some might see it as a cheap excuse to not clean the shed...
Posted by: jk at March 28, 2006 9:26 AMYou're probably right JK that I haven't had much to say on the matter of immigration reform directly. I have definitely been torn between competing principles on this one: Individual liberty on one hand and law and order on the other. There are solutions that will give us both, but I contend that none of what's on the table now does much good at improving either.
The most distasteful aspect of the situation is that our government's reckless disregard for the last number of decades has put us in a situation that almost insures that a pragmatist solution will be required. I can't bring myself to endorse such a thing, so I just focus on what really IS morally justifiable and leave the sausage making for others.
Posted by: johngalt at March 28, 2006 3:57 PMDonde estan sus tarjetas verdes??
;)
Posted by: TrekMedic251 at March 29, 2006 6:54 PMˇEnviado a la oficina de senador Juan McCain con la caja de Toasties de dos postes remata en el intercambio para una visa de H5-A!
Posted by: johngalt at April 4, 2006 3:13 PM | What do you think? [7]