February 15, 2006

We Got Questions

The Wall Street Journal Editorial Page has a list of questions about the VP's hunting "accident" that demand answers:

WSJ.com - Cheney's Coverup
• 5:30 p.m., Saturday (all times Central Standard Time). Mr. Cheney sprays Harry Whittington with birdshot, and the Secret Service immediately informs local police. Who is Harry Whittington and whom does he lobby for? Does he know Scooter Libby?

• 6:30 p.m. White House Chief of Staff Andy Card informs President Bush that there's been a hunting accident involving the Vice President's party. Did Mr. Bush ask followup questions? Was he intellectually curious?

• 7 p.m. Karl Rove tells Mr. Bush that it is Mr. Cheney who did the shooting. Why was this detail withheld for a full 30 minutes from the President? Who else did Mr. Rove talk to about this in the interim? Was Valerie Plame ever mentioned?

• 5 a.m., Sunday. White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan learns that Mr. Cheney is the shooter. He also fails to alert the media. Did he rush to write talking points or fall back to sleep?

• 11 a.m. Katharine Armstrong, owner of the ranch where the shooting took place, blows the story sky-high by giving the news to the Corpus Christi Caller-Times. According to Ms. Armstrong, Mr. Cheney told her to do what she thought made sense. Has Ms. Armstrong ever worked for Halliburton?

• 11:27 a.m., Monday. Mr. McClellan finally holds a press conference and gets grilled. One reporter actually asks (and we're not making this one up), "Would this be much more serious if the man had died?"

• 1:30 p.m. The Texas paper posts the story on its Web site, after calling the Veep's office for confirmation. Everyone involved confirms more or less everything, or so the official line goes. Their agreement is very suspicious.

For the record, Mr. McClellan replied, "Of course it would." We hope the 78-year-old Mr. Whittington recovers promptly after his heart attack yesterday. As for the Beltway press corps, it has once again earned the esteem in which it is held by the American public.


I was in a store last night that had Chris Matthews’s "Hardball" on. Chris was in highest dudgeon "Could a regular American citizen," he spewed at his guest, "wait 18 hours to notify the authorities after someone was shot?" (I hoped the guest was Senator Kennedy, but I was out of luck).

This is a good example of press bias -- not against a GOP VP -- but against a culture of hunting and shooting. Unfortunate as this is, the press corps can no more imagine a hunting trip than a lunar walk. Buffy might say "overreach much?"

Posted by jk at February 15, 2006 9:41 AM

If by "the authorities" Mr. Matthews means MSM prima donnas then yes, a "regular" American citizen could do exactly the same thing. According to this timeline (admittedly from the editorial pages of a right wing rag) the Secret Service informed local police of the incident "immediately."

I don't know about Dick Cheney but when I do something that embarrasses the living crap out of me the first thing I think of is "how can I get this out on the AP wire pronto?"

Good analysis JK - the MSM bias is definitely anti-hunting and anti-gun. But it is still, no less, anti-GOP VP.

Want to see how horrible gun accidents can happen to even the most experienced LEOs? Check out: http://www.thegunzone.com/mos/ad.html
or
http://www.thegunzone.com/nd.html
or
http://www.thegunzone.com/timm-nd.html

Posted by: johngalt at February 15, 2006 10:41 AM

18 hours to tell authorities?

You mean 18 hours to tell the Washington press corp.

No. He was in the hospital shortly after getting shot. The local sheriff's office did the investigation.

The authorities were fully informed.

Posted by: AlexC at February 16, 2006 1:29 PM

To Chris Matthews, the Washington Press Corps ARE the authorities.

Posted by: jk at February 16, 2006 1:38 PM | What do you think? [3]