August 26, 2005Reardon MetalSamizdat Brian Micklethwait got a laugh out of me with his comment that he "regards the word 'nanotechnology' as nerd-speak for it will never happen." But he links to a nanotubes article that you'd have to be comatose to read without excitement: The nanotubes are made of carbon and possess incredible strength. The sheets of nanotubes measure just a few times wider than the actual carbon atom, or 2 millionths-of-an-inch (2000 times thinner than paper). A square mile of this will could weigh as little as 170 pounds. The sheets are transparent, flexible and stronger than steel or high strength plastics. So, it's Reardon Metal, but it has photovoltaic properties and can emit light. Hank would be proud... On the web Posted by John Kranz at August 26, 2005 4:15 PM |
Yes, but what *color* is it?
I'm not sure I'd go as far as Micklethwait, but I read about nano-tech (particularly instapundit's excitement), and i'm saying to myself, "where's the nanotech?"
Promises are only exciting for so long. Let's see practical.
Posted by: AlexC at August 28, 2005 1:25 AMWell, I've been called a technocrat before but I think nanotech is poised to be "the next big (little) thing."
I'd compare it more to the transistor than the computer. It has applications in electronics, medicine and mechanics.
The excitement of the nanotubes is the suggestion that it is closest to commercialization. I'd have to think there will be a Moore’s Law of nanotech once it starts to show some ROI for the capital markets.
Posted by: jk at August 28, 2005 10:24 AM | What do you think? [2]