April 18, 2005EU Socialism is DeadI posted an item about Mark Steyn's "Sovereign Citizen" last night. In this piece Steyn finds portentous signals in globalization. Not the Jose Bove, college kids' concerns but whether new opportunities in formerly un-entreprising nations will stem the flow of human capital required by Western Europe and Canada. (Canada is a Western European Nation anymore, that last phrase may be redundant.) Today the WSJ Ed Page features a Guest Editorial about rapprochement between China and India. No doubt, China and India are competitors. China has already become the factory of the world, while India is gradually becoming the world's laboratory and back-office. China is seeking to emulate India's remarkable surge in software and IT-enabled services, while India is aiming to match China's stunning success in manufacturing. Both China and India are aggressively seeking hydrocarbon concessions in Central and East Asia, West Asia, Russia, Latin America and Africa -- in Sudan, they are joint-venture partners. Both countries are modernizing and expanding their military capabilities. But what Mr. Wen's visit demonstrates is that competition need not necessarily mean confrontation and conflict, and that areas of cooperation and engagement can indeed be worked out. You can add these two stories together in your head and see that our children will face a very different competitive picture than we have. Many fear for the US. And seeing our education system, I should not be so sanguine. But I think we will be able to parlay current advantages for another half a century. But "Old Europe" is toast. New economies in former Soviet republics, India and China -- these are the new trading partners. The German, French and Scandinavian economies can just wither away, new nations will take their place. The real question is whether the US will elect to go down the socialist path, and follow these high-tax, centralized command-and-control nations down. Or will we wise up and compete with these emerging economies before it is too late? To compete we will need a new tax system and we will need privatization of pensions. Are our legislators serious about these? It's not about the trust fund in 2042 -- it's about a company deciding where to build a new engineering center in 2008. |
Brilliant!
JK, this is a remarkable case for the urgency of Social Security reform, and tax reform soon thereafter. Bully!
Posted by: johngalt at April 19, 2005 2:31 PM | What do you think? [1]