April 14, 2005Another Cost of the Drug WarIs there anything more redundant and coals-to-Newcastleish than blogging Instapundit stories? Well, yes, blogging yesterday's Instapundit stories. But I can't let this go by. Glenn linked to a The Volokh Conspiracy posting. If losing Bork wasn't bad enough, this country appears to have lost a good second choice. Supreme Opportunity Cost: Sometimes we overly diminish the role of individuals when assessing historical developments. That Ronald Reagan was in a position to be President when he was probably changed the direction of the Republican party (and the US) for decades. Because of his distinctive personal characteristics, Bill Clinton was able to get elected when other Democrats of similar views are not. As President, he also signed on to a welfare reform bill—and brought along enough Democrats in Congress—that contains far more radical reform than anything President Bush has managed to achieve. In short, individuals matter. But, hey, we got Souter, right!? This is an uncounted cost of the drug war. Many have chosen not to seek elected office or decline an appointed permission because of past drug use. Note that an update to the Insty post from John Podhoretz seems to exonerate Bill Bennet. That's almost a shame, because he is an iconic figure of the drug war in the GOP. I like and respect him, but he and I strain the seams of the big tent on drug policy. |